Reply to Latin replication pulled from PCSB agenda

Forum Index » DC Public and Public Charter Schools

Reply to "Latin replication pulled from PCSB agenda"

Subject:

Emoticons





More smilies

Text Color: Font: Close Marks

[quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous]I think that was the PPs point. New Latin may well look like old Latin. [/quote]

True. Is it really a problem if New Latin looks like Old Latin? Latin is working for some (many) kids. [/quote]

It is for the PCSB. See condition #7.

The school will be eligible for charter renewal in school year 2020-21. If the school’s charter is renewed, it will need to negotiate a new charter agreement with DC PCSB. Provided the charter is renewed, should the DC PCSB Board determine, at the time of the renewal decision, that the school has failed to make satisfactory progress in addressing disproportionality in the use of exclusionary discipline, the number of at-risk students served, and/or the  performance of historically underperforming subgroups, the new charter 
agreement shall contain a mission-specific goal or goals to hold the school accountable in the remaining areas of concern. [/quote]

Wow, charter board is starting to sound just like public schools under NCLB. That was such a success.  :roll: [/quote]

Options

	Disable HTML in this message
	Disable BB Code in this message
	Disable smilies in this message

Review message

Search Recent Topics Hottest Topics