Reply to "I didn't run you over, so you need to calm down!"

Forum Index » Off-Topic

Reply to ""I didn't run you over, so you need to calm down!""

Subject:

Emoticons





More smilies

Text Color: Font: Close Marks

[quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous]
It’s actually not. But if you’re the PP with the list above, dead and injured pedestrians would be applicable because of your list as well. I’m also not sure how you think it’s too expensive to install pedestrian bridges but you think there are funds to alter roads? And the 3rd option just proves the point so many have made on this thread that pedestrians refuse to take measures they control to make themselves safer. It’s really mind boggling that it was listed as if it was a reasonable point.[/quote]

Making roads safer for pedestrians - for example, by adding bus lanes, bike lanes, and bump-outs - is cheaper than building bridges.

And pedestrians don't use pedestrian bridges because, like other human beings using other modes of transport, they are unwilling to take measures that are inconvenient, indirect, and unsafe. Pedestrian bridges don't work.

So, if you're unwilling to make the roads safer, what's your suggestion for preventing dead and injured pedestrians? [/quote]

Options

	Disable HTML in this message
	Disable BB Code in this message
	Disable smilies in this message

Review message

Search Recent Topics Hottest Topics