Toggle navigation
Toggle navigation
Home
DCUM Forums
Nanny Forums
Events
About DCUM
Advertising
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics
FAQs and Guidelines
Privacy Policy
Your current identity is: Anonymous
Login
Preview
Subject:
Forum Index
»
Private & Independent Schools
Reply to "My 4 Yr Old Son's FSIQ is 131, Now What?"
Subject:
Emoticons
More smilies
Text Color:
Default
Dark Red
Red
Orange
Brown
Yellow
Green
Olive
Cyan
Blue
Dark Blue
Violet
White
Black
Font:
Very Small
Small
Normal
Big
Giant
Close Marks
[quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous]No, not BS. Several people who disagree with you cited other studies and books. Which I doubt you are bothering to read. .[/quote] Your post can definitely be read in multiple ways. If you want to sneak out of that one, how about how you sneered at the MoCo poster's "little world" in 16:01? Did you read the post? [b] Basically the net of the post was that her entire point of view was based on her experience in MoCo magnets.[/b] Or this little gem at 14:57: "Yet what you offer is utterly uninformed nonsense. Take the time to read some of those articles, and you will learn that you don't even have a minimal understanding of common definitions of intelligence, much less psychometrics." [b]I didn't write 14:57....sorry.[/b] Here is the issue: people have disagreed with you and have offered their own research. Instead of agreeing to disagree, or, god forbid, reading the research they offer, you sneer at them. [b]I have thanked other posters for their research and also agreed with some of the other's views on intelligence. Heck, I have ordered the 10,000 book off of Amazon for god's sake.[/b]Then you shift the debate, again and again. It's about whether intelligence is innate. No, it's about funding gifted education because gifted kids will save the world. No, THE WHOLE PROBLEM (your caps) is that low-SES kids aren't being identified. Here, have a dozen links that cover all these issues and many more. [b]All posts on DCUM take twists and turns. Heck, if we stayed on topic we'd all be talking about the OP's 4 year old still. So I'm getting ready for a new round of posts claiming that "giftedness is unwelcome on DCUM." Unfortunately, you don't have enough perception to realize that you're the problem.[/quote][/b] I have done nothing but offer information. You can spin it any way you wish but all the writing is right here. You do realize that I've been advocating for underprivledged children, right?[/quote]
Options
Disable HTML in this message
Disable BB Code in this message
Disable smilies in this message
Review message
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics