Reply to Massive home addition causes confusion in Fairfax County neighborhood

Forum Index » Real Estate

Reply to "Massive home addition causes confusion in Fairfax County neighborhood"

Subject:

Emoticons





More smilies

Text Color: Font: Close Marks

[quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous]There’s no way that massive addition would meet building codes even if it could meet setback requirements. [/quote]

It literally did as designed. [/quote]

It literally was not built according to the approved plans or following building codes for wind bracing.

Sooo...[/quote]

The approved plan was equally ugly and something all the neighbors would hate just as much! So yes, that addition COULD have met all the relevant codes.[/quote]

But it didn't meet the codes as built.

Literally. [/quote]

But the question is whether the design could meet the building codes without the setback violation. It definitely could. Indeed, it did.[/quote]

No.

It "definitely " and "literally" did not.

It was not built to the approved plans.

You could set that thing in a 5 acre lot by itself with no neighbors, and as built it did not meet building codes and did not follow the approved plans, setback or not.[/quote]

This is just wrong. The written plans complied. That’s why it was approved. [/quote]

The building did not adhere to the approved plans.[/quote]

Options

	Disable HTML in this message
	Disable BB Code in this message
	Disable smilies in this message

Review message

Search Recent Topics Hottest Topics