Toggle navigation
Toggle navigation
Home
DCUM Forums
Nanny Forums
Events
About DCUM
Advertising
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics
FAQs and Guidelines
Privacy Policy
Your current identity is: Anonymous
Login
Preview
Subject:
Forum Index
»
Fairfax County Public Schools (FCPS)
Reply to "Boundary Review Meetings"
Subject:
Emoticons
More smilies
Text Color:
Default
Dark Red
Red
Orange
Brown
Yellow
Green
Olive
Cyan
Blue
Dark Blue
Violet
White
Black
Font:
Very Small
Small
Normal
Big
Giant
Close Marks
[quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous]How did meeting go tonight? Takeaways?[/quote] One big takeaway is that they seem to be planning to reduce transfers and are managing that process differently next school year. It may be harder for a student to transfer out for language, for example, because they will make alternative options available. [/quote] My takeaways: --Lewis parents (like myself) are very upset that this boundary process did nothing to actually move more students to Lewis. --We are upset that they would even consider moving more kids out of Lewis (Rolling Valley). But it seems that this came to a surprise at Dr. Reid so I'm hopeful this will be fixed in scenero 5. --We need to be supportive of cracking down on reasons for kids to leave Lewis --Our parents and community are wonderful and Lewis is a great school, but we need more students [/quote] [b]Why would you want to make it harder for students to leave?[/b] Also interested why you'd want note students in? Expanding the size of teams and clubs?[/quote] Because 300 kids pupil place out of Lewis every year which is the reason why it’s under enrolled. Better to bring them back to their home school with AP and language classes then to try to force hundreds of other kids from different neighborhoods to move into Lewis to replace them. If you don’t close the pupil place loopholes those kids will pupil place out too. That’s why we have to start there.[/quote] They need to do both. Slowing pupil placement won't fully solve the problem. [/quote]. NP and I agree! Slow transfers AND add students. [/quote] If the 300 lewis zoned kids remained at Lewis, the school would be at full capacity with no room for any additional students. Start with the families that bought houses zoned for Lewis before experimenting on moving kids who live in schools zones from other neighborhoods. [/quote] So, you’re advocating that there be no transfers from any school and not just from Lewis, right? Or are you singling out Lewis? IMO, I say don’t allow any transfers for any reason other than SpecialEd. It will make planning easier. Singling out Lewis is indefensible.[/quote] Well, the discussion was about Lewis. Sure, stop school transfers everywhere [/quote] One of the SB members did say in the discussion on start times that 30% of bus routes are for transfer students, which feels like a really big number. Feels like if they dropped IB that would solve a lot at the HS level and if they do follow through with AAP centers at every middle school that will help. [/quote] What do you mean? Pupil placements under the student transfer regulation are not provided transportation.[/quote]
Options
Disable HTML in this message
Disable BB Code in this message
Disable smilies in this message
Review message
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics