Toggle navigation
Toggle navigation
Home
DCUM Forums
Nanny Forums
Events
About DCUM
Advertising
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics
FAQs and Guidelines
Privacy Policy
Your current identity is: Anonymous
Login
Preview
Subject:
Forum Index
»
Real Estate
Reply to "Massive home addition causes confusion in Fairfax County neighborhood"
Subject:
Emoticons
More smilies
Text Color:
Default
Dark Red
Red
Orange
Brown
Yellow
Green
Olive
Cyan
Blue
Dark Blue
Violet
White
Black
Font:
Very Small
Small
Normal
Big
Giant
Close Marks
[quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous]There’s no way that massive addition would meet building codes even if it could meet setback requirements. [/quote] It literally did as designed. [/quote] It literally was not built according to the approved plans or following building codes for wind bracing. Sooo...[/quote] The approved plan was equally ugly and something all the neighbors would hate just as much! So yes, that addition COULD have met all the relevant codes.[/quote] But it didn't meet the codes as built. Literally. [/quote] But the question is whether the design could meet the building codes without the setback violation. It definitely could. Indeed, it did.[/quote] No. It "definitely " and "literally" did not. It was not built to the approved plans. You could set that thing in a 5 acre lot by itself with no neighbors, and as built it did not meet building codes and did not follow the approved plans, setback or not.[/quote] This is just wrong. The written plans complied. That’s why it was approved. [/quote] You two are arguing about different things. Both of you are correct, but you are not saying the same things. Person 1 - states the written plans complied with county zoning and were approved. This is true, but note the HO had an error in the plans he submitted to the county, and was subsequently approved. Person 2 - states while plans were approved, the HO did not BUILD to the approved plans. This is also true.[/quote] +1 "Looked good on paper" doesn't cut it. [/quote]
Options
Disable HTML in this message
Disable BB Code in this message
Disable smilies in this message
Review message
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics