Toggle navigation
Toggle navigation
Home
DCUM Forums
Nanny Forums
Events
About DCUM
Advertising
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics
FAQs and Guidelines
Privacy Policy
Your current identity is: Anonymous
Login
Preview
Subject:
Forum Index
»
Metropolitan DC Local Politics
Reply to "Hearst Playground story in Current"
Subject:
Emoticons
More smilies
Text Color:
Default
Dark Red
Red
Orange
Brown
Yellow
Green
Olive
Cyan
Blue
Dark Blue
Violet
White
Black
Font:
Very Small
Small
Normal
Big
Giant
Close Marks
[quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous]This is the fundamental question: Should Hearst remain a city "park" or be developed into a "DPR facility"?[/quote] The question is moot, because Hearst IS a DPR facility. Taxpayers have been begging for a pool in the area. Our Councilmember listened and asked DPR to find a place and she found money in the budget for it. There is plenty of room to keep the beautiful trees that line the field and the field while also keeping 1-2 courts (that are seldom used) and adding a pool. [/quote] Wait. Didn't y'all say that the pool would fit within one tennis court. Now it's "one or two" that could be displaced. Without a clear plan, the Hearst pool is as a PP suggested, like a Rorschach test. Some people just see what they want without any idea of its true dimensions or location. In any event, they will cut down a lot of trees, because otherwise some people will complain about a pool that is always shaded.[/quote]
Options
Disable HTML in this message
Disable BB Code in this message
Disable smilies in this message
Review message
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics
