Toggle navigation
Toggle navigation
Home
DCUM Forums
Nanny Forums
Events
About DCUM
Advertising
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics
FAQs and Guidelines
Privacy Policy
Your current identity is: Anonymous
Login
Preview
Subject:
Forum Index
»
Entertainment and Pop Culture
Reply to "Lively/Baldoni Lawsuit Part 2"
Subject:
Emoticons
More smilies
Text Color:
Default
Dark Red
Red
Orange
Brown
Yellow
Green
Olive
Cyan
Blue
Dark Blue
Violet
White
Black
Font:
Very Small
Small
Normal
Big
Giant
Close Marks
[quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous]I can't believe Wayfarer's biggest fan still can't spell the company name right. He's going to produce under a name his fan can't even get right? Shows how unknown and irrelevant they are.[/quote] I love how you pearl clutchers are like he sexually harassed a woman?!?! He won’t survive in Hollywood! If there is one industry that will not stand for treating women bad it’s Hollywood. I’m sure no white male executives who still run Hollywood ever want to work with this studio again! Give me a freaking break. Wayfarer has $1 billion backer of course they’re going to continue to pump out movies. Blake will be the one who suffers from this. Apparently isabel too as she was just starting out and she has gained no more Instagram followers, and has no more movies in the works which is kind of sad that she got caught up in this. Blake won’t do much acting again and somehow we will survive without her movies, and Ryan will probably do fine. I doubt it was worth bringing this lawsuit, but whatever it’s their money. [/quote] I agree Hollywood doesn't really care about bad behavior but they need a distributor and this has been a massive headache for SONY. And neither Justin or Jamey are good at their jobs. Some actors aren't going to want to work with them. I think Wayfarer will be able to make movies but nothing big. [/quote] Dont forget lawsuits with 4 different insurance companies. But it's all Blake's fault! [/quote] Huh? Insurers are always trying to wriggle out of these things. Nothing to do with the validity of Blake’s claims.[/quote] The post was about their viability as a studio, not thr validity of her claims. And this isn’t just them trying to wriggle out, they are arguing WF had legal notice of her claims and did not disclose. And another thing that will be difficult for WF is how they went against the Sony marketing plan with the DV stuff and possibly (allegedly) launched a campaign against the lead actress for their own benefit. Maybe those are typical in Hollywood and its just that no one is dumb enough to openly text about it.[/quote] Sony President Sanford Panitch on Blake Lively: “The hair sell at the same time was epic level stupid…She did it to herself” [/quote] lol for life at this. “Oh my gah what does he even know????”[/quote]
Options
Disable HTML in this message
Disable BB Code in this message
Disable smilies in this message
Review message
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics