Toggle navigation
Toggle navigation
Home
DCUM Forums
Nanny Forums
Events
About DCUM
Advertising
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics
FAQs and Guidelines
Privacy Policy
Your current identity is: Anonymous
Login
Preview
Subject:
Forum Index
»
Soccer
Reply to "ECNL forcing Brave & Union Partnership"
Subject:
Emoticons
More smilies
Text Color:
Default
Dark Red
Red
Orange
Brown
Yellow
Green
Olive
Cyan
Blue
Dark Blue
Violet
White
Black
Font:
Very Small
Small
Normal
Big
Giant
Close Marks
[quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous]2012s, 50-60 players. 6 goalies. Clear top field. Light on BRYC. Don't know about externals or VYS. Couldn't tell by numbers if they were pre grouped. [/quote] Thought there was fairly equal representation of the 3 clubs. Maybe VYS a little more, BRYC a little less and McLean in the middle. A handful of outside girls. There clearly was prior discussion and coordination between the coaches on how the groups would be split and even which girls, if not pre-selected for the top field, were going to get looks and rotated. 9-10 coaches out there. It appeared to be mostly merit-based with a slight lean towards equal representation (hopefully how this whole merger goes). A few stronger VYS girls never made it to the top field while other clubs’ girls got rotated in. MV ran the show and then joined CW who never left the top field.[/quote] This is sport why you looking or hoping for equal representation? That mentality is not going to end well for you in this ridiculous ECNL soccer world. Seriously…good luck to you![/quote] I would prefer 100% merit-based but that’s not reality. So if it’s only a slight lean towards equal representation, I think that is a win. Maybe in a few years, all of the politics can be removed. [/quote]
Options
Disable HTML in this message
Disable BB Code in this message
Disable smilies in this message
Review message
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics