Toggle navigation
Toggle navigation
Home
DCUM Forums
Nanny Forums
Events
About DCUM
Advertising
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics
FAQs and Guidelines
Privacy Policy
Your current identity is: Anonymous
Login
Preview
Subject:
Forum Index
»
Metropolitan DC Local Politics
Reply to "Hearst Playground story in Current"
Subject:
Emoticons
More smilies
Text Color:
Default
Dark Red
Red
Orange
Brown
Yellow
Green
Olive
Cyan
Blue
Dark Blue
Violet
White
Black
Font:
Very Small
Small
Normal
Big
Giant
Close Marks
[quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous]There are public tennis courts at UDC (three blocks away) and the Newark St park in McLean Gardens. In addition, there are courts at Sidwell, the Cathedral, Rose Park, Livingston Playground, Lafayette Playground and on and on. Look at an aerial, there are tennis courts, most of them public, all over the place. No public outdoor pools. That is why we need one. And, why is anyone assuming Hearst would lose tennis courts? No one from DPR has suggested that, so let's not let the strawman win that argument. [/quote] Sidwell, the Cathedral, etc. are private courts. UDC is usually closed to the community. No one has seen a plan for Hearst yet, but it's unlikely a pool could be shoehorned in without taking out existing facilities. If I had to choose something to go, however, I'd get rid of the turf field and the basketball courts at the top of the hill nearest the school. They could easily be relocated to the other side of the school building near Tilden St.[/quote]
Options
Disable HTML in this message
Disable BB Code in this message
Disable smilies in this message
Review message
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics