Reply to Ben Carson: Islamophobe of the Day

Forum Index » Political Discussion

Reply to "Ben Carson: Islamophobe of the Day"

Subject:

Emoticons





More smilies

Text Color: Font: Close Marks

[quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=jsteele][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=jsteele][quote=Anonymous]How many times do I have to say ALL???  I'm debating you because you seem to lack the concept that individuals and religions are separate entities.  As I said, if you want to debate the political acceptance of a religions, start a thread with that topic.  Do you or do you not politically support Religion XYZ?  That is the question.  Not do you support candidate ABC who may support parts of Religion XYZ.  You want to pick and choose parts of a Religion like it's an individual.  You can't do that, you have to consider the entirety of the Religion.  Which you seem incapable of doing.

Do you support Islam and all that it stands for?  If the answer is no, then your calling yourself a bigot along with everyone else.[/quote]

Actually, this thread is about Ben Carson saying that a Muslim shouldn't be President. It actually seems like you who need to go start your own thread. Your responses confuse me because you seem to be vehemently arguing that I am wrong, but then make exactly the same argument that I am making. So, let's make this simple. The US Constitution states that there should be no religious test for holding public office. [b]Do support that clause of the US Constitution[/b]?

[/quote]

Not the PP but no-I do not.  If a religion is contradictory to the constitution, then why bother having a constitution at all?  We may as well elect a communist to run our country.[/quote]

EXACTLY. The tenants of Islam are NOT in line with the Constitution, the laws of this land. If they were, Islamists would not be pushing for Sharia here.[/quote]

According to Kim Davis, Christianity is not in line with the Constitution. So, I guess Christians should be prohibited from being President. 
[/quote]

If a Christian's intention in the Presidency is to run the country according to their own religious laws instead of the Constitution, you would be correct. [/quote]

Yep, Kim Davis might as well have pulled out a zippo and torched the Constitution when she spat on the Equal Protection clause...[/quote]

Options

	Disable HTML in this message
	Disable BB Code in this message
	Disable smilies in this message

Review message

Search Recent Topics Hottest Topics