Toggle navigation
Toggle navigation
Home
DCUM Forums
Nanny Forums
Events
About DCUM
Advertising
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics
FAQs and Guidelines
Privacy Policy
Your current identity is: Anonymous
Login
Preview
Subject:
Forum Index
»
College and University Discussion
Reply to "A reality check on "strong extracurriculars""
Subject:
Emoticons
More smilies
Text Color:
Default
Dark Red
Red
Orange
Brown
Yellow
Green
Olive
Cyan
Blue
Dark Blue
Violet
White
Black
Font:
Very Small
Small
Normal
Big
Giant
Close Marks
[quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous]Pause for a moment and think logically. The goal for any applicant, whether it be college, job or even romantic partnership, is to stand out and distinguish oneself from others. When the most common and popular activity for kids throughout all schooling nationwide is participation in sports, how would that be a [b]strong[/b] extracurricular? Sports are simply a fine but very common extracurricular. that is, unless the college applicant will be a recruited athlete. Then and only then does the narrative change.[/quote] Sports works if it’s tied in. I’ve seen this example before in several places. A girl who was a fencer and equestrian, with natl equestrian awards (not recruited). No fencing awards. Focused on medieval studies/Middle Ages history. Research on Eleanor of Aquitaine who rode her horse into battle in crusades? 1 month study at a museum in England. Other Middle Ages /history ECs. Good stats (not tippy top/great). Highest math: calc AB equivalent Admitted HYPS. [/quote] I can see that but that is such a corner case. But to be fair, all admits are sort of corner cases. [/quote]
Options
Disable HTML in this message
Disable BB Code in this message
Disable smilies in this message
Review message
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics