Reply to Indictment of Southern Policy Law Center

Forum Index » Political Discussion

Reply to "Indictment of Southern Policy Law Center"

Subject:

Emoticons





More smilies

Text Color: Font: Close Marks

[quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous]Wake up, people.

This is part of the Administration’s plan to discredit and dissolve nonprofits.

They are distorting the facts for soundbites to shock people.

Anyone with half a brain realizes their tactics were aimed at infiltrating and disrupting hate groups…which they succeeding at. They obviously don’t—and weren’t—supporting hate groups.

This is so ridiculous. When will this madness end?

If they polled donors, they would undoubtedly support the tactics to disrupt hate groups. Duh.

DOJ should be ashamed.

Congress needs to step up. [/quote]

This![/quote]

No, the nonprofits are discrediting themselves.  Giving money to the KKK is not a charitable activity, and SPLC lied to its donors about its purposes.  This is simple.  You ignore the lying to the donors part.  [/quote]
Meanwhile in reality, 501(c)(3) nonprofits can and do pay informants.  There is no blanket prohibition. IRS rules explicitly allow 501(c)(3) organizations to pay "informers" or tipsters for information on criminal activity when it supports their charitable mission (e.g., alleviating burdens on government by fighting crime or extremism).[/quote]
Sorry, forgot the source: the federal tax code. 1.501(c)(3)-1(d)(2)[/quote]

I don't see where the word "informer" is used or there is any language that would explicitly permit that activity. Can you show me what I'm missing?[/quote]
[twitter]https://x.com/moejlong/status/2047330773359800568?s=46&t=kf1qYlCXQnKgUhJWEIu2vg[/twitter][/quote]

You do know that [b]money laundering[/b] is a crime?  And, [b]if[/b] you are paying "informants" to agitate and pay for transportation, that is a problem.

My retired AUSA source said that from reading the indictment that they likely have documentation and witnesses. He thinks it is likely someone from within the organization.  He also said this will be a long time before trial.    He said that there must be lots of "F" people from the numbers.[/quote]
They better have documentation and witnesses showing that the SPLC lied to donors because it’s definitely not in the indictment.[/quote]

Options

	Disable HTML in this message
	Disable BB Code in this message
	Disable smilies in this message

Review message

Search Recent Topics Hottest Topics