Reply to Meghan King Edmonds loses custody of kids to Jim Edmonds

Forum Index » Entertainment and Pop Culture

Reply to "Meghan King Edmonds loses custody of kids to Jim Edmonds"

Subject:

Emoticons





More smilies

Text Color: Font: Close Marks

[quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous]There is a difference between defending someone and being cynical about what a rich and powerful man's PR team has leaked to the media and achieved through the family court system. [/quote]
Then you would post as such instead of the screeds that have been posted on this thread about people just “knowing” Jim must be a narcissistic abuser manipulating the courts. All of these rants painting Meghan as a victim would be more factual rather than just “feelings” that poor Meghan is being mistreated. Instead of you know, the people actually being mistreated - her kids?[/quote]

The allegation came via third-party quote from a woman who'd seen video footage of prior custody exchanges and she described Jim as being rageful and frightening and putting thd kids in the middle of the conflict where Meghsb tried to shield them. Her organization is a watchdog for abusers. The organization is One Mom’s Battle.  [/quote]
Multiple posters made the same claims earlier in the thread. And you’ve lost the plot if you believe anything from One Mom’s Battle.[/quote]

Of course, as a group of educated moms, we believe in One Mom's Battle and in the work they are doing to help children and mothers.   You now sound like the problem. [/quote]

She has an extreme bias and agenda and needs to keep that in everything she says and does as that is how she makes a living. Kind of skews her narrative when you can already predict exactly what she will say about each case. [/quote]

+1 People need to stop being so gullible about this woman.[/quote]

[b]I know Tina Swithin and you and the other PP have not one single iota of a clue what you are talking about and you are simply dead wrong[/b]. But I know that won't mean a thing to you. You won't take the time to listen to or read her story (she herself is a child of divorce and she was raised by her *father* who she says was the healthier of her two parents), how she advocates for *childrens' rights* and supports *protective parents* (whether that is the mother or the father), and she also talks about the name "One Mom's Battle" and how she chose that name over 15 years ago when she started a little unknown blog at the time, documenting her own (as the mother, as in "one mom") battle and how that name doesn't fit anymore but it has become so synonymous with her advocacy platform that it would be too difficult to change.[/quote]

You’d be wrong. Which is why you and others posting about One Mom and all these narcissistic rants are so incredibly dangerous. [/quote]

You can keep trying to undermine with your unmitigated one-line BS responses with zero details or facts, it won't work. 
[/quote]

Pot meet kettle.[/quote]

You have a reading comprehension problem.
[/quote]
Nope. You’re just so deep into your online fantasies that you can’t see how disturbed Meghan has been over the years. All from her own POV.[/quote]

Of course it's your prerogative to be an apologist and supporter of malignant narcissist abusers.
[/quote]
Again, pot meet kettle.[/quote]

This is hilarious and definitely a very juvenile "I know you are, but what am I" style of comebacks.
 [/quote]

Options

	Disable HTML in this message
	Disable BB Code in this message
	Disable smilies in this message

Review message

Search Recent Topics Hottest Topics