Toggle navigation
Toggle navigation
Home
DCUM Forums
Nanny Forums
Events
About DCUM
Advertising
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics
FAQs and Guidelines
Privacy Policy
Your current identity is: Anonymous
Login
Preview
Subject:
Forum Index
»
Religion
Reply to "Jesus' Historicity"
Subject:
Emoticons
More smilies
Text Color:
Default
Dark Red
Red
Orange
Brown
Yellow
Green
Olive
Cyan
Blue
Dark Blue
Violet
White
Black
Font:
Very Small
Small
Normal
Big
Giant
Close Marks
[quote=Anonymous]No, that description is not considered accurate by mainstream historians of early Christianity. But: It does reflect a minority, mythicist-leaning interpretation (associated with writers like Burton Mack, Earl Doherty, and Richard Carrier). Most scholars-across secular, Jewish, Christian, and atheist backgrounds-reject the idea that Jesus began as a purely heavenly being invented later. What Mainstream Scholars Agree On (Think: Paula Fredriksen, Bart Ehrman, James Dunn, E.P. Sanders, Dale Allison, John Meier, Géza Vermes) 1. Jesus was a real apocalyptic Jewish preacher from Galilee. There is overwhelming consensus-shared by religious and nonreligious historians-that: -A historical Jesus existed -He preached in Galilee -He gathered tollowers -He was executed by Pontius Pilate around 30 CE This conclusion rests on multiple independent textual streams (Mark, Q material, Paul's references to Jesus' family, Josephus, etc.). The claim that Christianity began only with a visionary sect and only later created an earthly Jesus is not accepted by specialists in the field. 2. The Infancy Narratives are theological, not historical. This is partially correct. Scholars overwhelmingly agree that: 1 Luke’s census as described did not historically occur. -Matthew's Star of Bethlehem is not a historical astronomical event. The Massacre of the Innocents is not supported by evidence outside Matthew These narratives are understood as literary/ theological constructions designed to: -Tie Jesus to Davidic lineage -Fulfill scriptural motifs -Present Jesus as a "new Moses" or new Israel So yes, this part aligns with mainstream scholarship. But it does not imply the entire life of Jesus was invented. 3. Paul's theology is innovative. Mainstream scholars agree that Paul: -Emphasized faith in Christ over adherence to the full Mosaic Law -Presented Jesus in cosmic, exalted terms -Played a major role in spreading Christianity among Gentiles But this is NOT understood as "Paul invented Christianity." Rather: he reinterpreted an already existing movement following a real, earthly Jesus. —>What the Excerpt Claims That Is Not Accepted by Historians 1. "The earliest movement followed a heavenly savior with no earthly life." This is mythicist theory, not mainstream scholarship. Paul: -Mentions Jesus' birth ("born of a woman,"Gal 4:4) -Mentions his Jewish identity -Mentions brothers (James, "the brother of the Lord," Gal 1:19) -Refers to his earthly teachings - Refers to the Last Supper tradition -Refers to his crucifixion under earthly powers 2. "The Gospels retrofitted a fictional biography onto a cosmic Christ." Scholars see it differently: -The Gospels shape memory through theology and storytelling -But they do not invent Jesus wholesale -They reflect real traditions, expanded and interpreted -Think: not biography vs. fiction, but memory shaped by theology, like ancient biographies of other figures. 3. "The historical bedrock is James the Just's visionary sect." James was an important early leader. But there's no evidence he founded a religion around visions of a heavenly Christ. Instead: —>James leads the Jerusalem church after Jesus' death ——>He sees himself preserving Jesus' teachings within a Jewish framework ———>Paul's letters indicate continuity with Jesus' earthly ministry, not invention of a mythic Christ What Historians Do Think the Gospels Are The best model is: 1. Jesus existed as a real preacher. 2. Early followers experienced visions of him after his death (very similar to how ancient Jewish apocalyptic groups understood martyrdom and vindication). 3. Traditions about him circulated orally for decades. 4. The Gospel writers shaped those traditions into theological narratives, adding symbolic material (infancy stories, miracle patterns, scriptural fulfillment). This view explains: A. Both the mythic/symbolic layers B. And the historical core beneath them without requiring Jesus to be invented wholesale.[/quote]
Options
Disable HTML in this message
Disable BB Code in this message
Disable smilies in this message
Review message
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics