Reply to Are we ready to admit that Woke & DEI and woke wasn’t what was holding you back from success?

Forum Index » Political Discussion

Reply to "Are we ready to admit that Woke & DEI and woke wasn’t what was holding you back from success?"

Subject:

Emoticons





More smilies

Text Color: Font: Close Marks

[quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous]I don't know, OP, I'm mostly just happy that I don't have to look at ads with ugly people, spend every day of pride month being re-educated, or explain why I won't announce my pronouns at the start of a meeting.

Stock market is doing awesome. Everything is great. No complaints. [/quote]

In other words, you think black people are ugly, you’re happy inside your bubble, and you work for a fictional company where everyone is required to recite their pronouns at the start of each and every meeting.  I’m fascinated, which company is this?  And why are black people ugly?

The stock market’s performance has nothing to do with DEI.[/quote]

I'm pretty sure he's mostly talking about fat people.  But it's interesting you immediately thought he was talking about black people.  [/quote]

Lol! I wrote that bit about ugly people and just saw this thing where a liberal immediately interpreted that to mean "black people." Wtf! Man, that's really gross to think black = ugly. The left is crazy racist. [/quote]

That’s because the comment was made within the context of a discussion of race and DEI (reminder: this is a thread about DEI, which does not include fat people or ugly people), so it came across as “so glad I no longer have to look at black people in ads”.

The right loves to say vague shit like this, then try to weasel their way out by claiming “oh no, that’s not what I meant”.  God forbid you ever actually say what you mean.[/quote]

It would never have even occurred to me that people would equate black with ugly. We live in an age where Beyonce and Zendaya are A listers. It is just not a natural conclusion, even in the context of DEI.

DEI in ads was absolutely all about an androgynous aesthetic in which body hair was prominently featured and other items, like colostomy bags, were front and center. Look at Ella Emhoff's modeling work. Half the time she had visible, pus filled zits, usually had her eyebrows grown together like Frida, and wore her hair in an unfeminine way. This is all unnecessary. Normally people would do something about the giant zits before the photo shoot. But the woke agenda is to make us pretend this is the preferred, most attractive look. It's not.

It's not making fun of people with disabilities to say you dont want to look at colostomy bags while shopping for jeans. In normal life, I've never seen someone just letting it all hang out there. This "look at my armpit hair" "look at my poop bag" "it's all as beautiful as Sydney Sweeney" is just gas lighting and gross. [/quote]

And maybe some of us don’t want to look at airbrushed, underweight models and be gaslit into thinking we’re inadequate because we don’t measure up to a fake ideal of Photoshopped perfection.[/quote]

YEAH!!!!

Ugly people want to see themselves represented in clothing commercials too!!![/quote]

You are incredibly rude and your sarcasm isn’t funny at all pp.  and furthermore, you appear ignorant of the ugly breadth of oppression in all its ugly forms.  See: the wheel of oppression, for starters[/quote]

Options

	Disable HTML in this message
	Disable BB Code in this message
	Disable smilies in this message

Review message

Search Recent Topics Hottest Topics