Toggle navigation
Toggle navigation
Home
DCUM Forums
Nanny Forums
Events
About DCUM
Advertising
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics
FAQs and Guidelines
Privacy Policy
Your current identity is: Anonymous
Login
Preview
Subject:
Forum Index
»
Political Discussion
Reply to "Kilmar coming back"
Subject:
Emoticons
More smilies
Text Color:
Default
Dark Red
Red
Orange
Brown
Yellow
Green
Olive
Cyan
Blue
Dark Blue
Violet
White
Black
Font:
Very Small
Small
Normal
Big
Giant
Close Marks
[quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous]It is the only way the administration can bring him back with a wisp of dignity. They've been preparing this for weeks and Pam Bondi rehearsed her speech so she could say it with a straight face. The DOJ lawyer in charge of his case before his deportation was fired, because he told the truth to the judge. [b]Hopefully justice prevails. [/b] [/quote] They've trumped up a clearly unproveable human trafficking charge in order to buy time to legally deport him. Added bonus, no one is talking about CECOT anymore.[/quote] There is video. The trooper could also testify. Maybe it is not provable, but it looks pretty much like evidence to me. But, I'm not lawyer. [/quote] The DOJ claims he was trafficking people, but there is a filing on record from before the incident with the full disclosure that he was traveling to MD from Texas. Why would someone who was trafficking people notifiy the authorities of the same?[/quote] The administration is grasping hard. What an embarrassing week for Trump.[/quote] The Tennessee grand jury indictments are very serious. It was not done on a lark. [b]What it really means is that while people like you were screaming due process, the people behind the scenes quietly did some investigating and found out a lot more about the El Salvadoran Kilmar.[/b] Which is unfortunate for him, I suppose. Ironically he probably would have been better off quietly accepting the deportation order instead of fighting it. And I wouldn't be surprised if more stuff comes out later, potentially about his activities in El Salvador. He was unquestionably a human trafficker. [/quote] Do you really not see anything I constitutional about what you said? Are you being serious? First of all…screaming about due process??? Do you not believe in due process? Please realize that due process is key to our judicial system. EVERYONE gets due process. No matter how obvious, blatant, or horrific the crime is, due process. It isn’t about protecting criminals. It is about protecting all Americans. At any time, you or I could be in the wrong place at the wrong time and be suspected of a crime. Do you really want to set the precedent where LE can say, “Eh, it really seems like she did it. Just lock her up. No need for a trial”? That’s what we have been fighting here. I don’t know anything about Garcia or this case. I don’t know if he is guilty or innocent. That is beside the point. We should be able to trust the judicial system to accurately determine his guilt or innocence and, if guilty, apply a punishment that fits the crime. And do you realize that you just admitted he was detained and THEN they did investigating to try to find evidence of him committing a crime? You really think it’s ok to say, “Hey, that tattoo seems questionable. We are going to detain and deport you and then investigate you until we find something sketchy.” Again, this is not about protecting one person. This is about protecting all of us and our constitution. [/quote]
Options
Disable HTML in this message
Disable BB Code in this message
Disable smilies in this message
Review message
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics