Reply to Schools most harmed and those most benefiting once NIH, DHS funding resumes?

Forum Index » College and University Discussion

Reply to "Schools most harmed and those most benefiting once NIH, DHS funding resumes?"

Subject:

Emoticons





More smilies

Text Color: Font: Close Marks

[quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous]Bump

This thread is going to get list in the colleges area but it is a massive policy shift for biomedical research and health.[/quote]

How does this benefit MAGA voters or red states?  Research is expensive but compared to our national budget it is nothing.  Confused,  How is science and medical research partisan?[/quote]

MAGAs must believe they are a superior breed of humans immune from cancer, Alzheimer’s and premier afflictions. [/quote]

stop lumping all magas together. some like jd vance, elon, rfk even, and trump’s family are fairly well educated. the reality is the democrats gave a piss poor choice. kamala was an abject disaster with an inability to put forth a plan that would solve the inflationary issues or budget deficit . trump was a less bad alternative.[/quote]

So what is the DonoldX brilliant plan?  100s of weird EOs in the wain of Michael Scott yelling "I declare bankruptcy"?  Taking over Gaza?  Constant threat of tariffs creating an inflationary overhang and driving fdown consumer confidence?  Gutting of CIA and causing chaos in FBI and this incredibly harming intelligence gatherign/executing ability?

Current system of three branches of govt over the last 250 years created the most prosperous country in the world history, but we now need a zero EQ nerd to rip it all up because he once read Ayn Rand and Curtis "dunning-kruger" Yarvin?  Ridiculous![/quote]

i don't believe in his approach at the moment but I will give him time to refine his execution.  I did not and still do not have faith in what kamala would have done, and that would have been zero progress in reducing crime in blue cities like san francisco, DC, NYC, continued high inflation, and an absurd national debt expansion.  She was and remains not qualified.  She was never qualified for Attorney General of California either.  And neither is Pam Bondi for National AG.  I only wish the democrats came up with a quality candidate.[/quote]

You keep listing artificial reasons for voting for Trump.  If you had spent 10 seconds investigating crime rates you would know what your write isn’t true.

So…let’s recap…you voted for someone who directly told you his plan was to increase inflation with tariffs…who never mentioned or cared about crime rates in blue cities…who ran up $8TN in deficits when he was president and is planning to pass a budget that won’t touch the deficit…

Just be honest and let us know you hate immigrants or whatever shitty reason you voted for him.[/quote]

(but they did their research, LOLOLOLOL)[/quote]

this is why you lost the election, you
clowns. you bash the other side when i told you i voted for obama before. they propped up biden who cant remember what the hell he is even saying and then the dunce kamala.
san francisco is an abject shithole as is nyc due to homelessness.  that is why the liberal mayor of sf was replaced.

[/quote]

It doesn’t sound like you’ve ever actually been in NYC or SF. [/quote]

i literally live in sf in soma. London Breed lost the election because did she nothing to stop the shoplifting and violent crime.  A san francisco 49ers player was shot for his rolex in the heart of downtown.  how delusional are you folks.[/quote]

Options

	Disable HTML in this message
	Disable BB Code in this message
	Disable smilies in this message

Review message

Search Recent Topics Hottest Topics