Reply to Volleyball Action

Forum Index » Volleyball

Reply to "Volleyball Action"

Subject:

Emoticons





More smilies

Text Color: Font: Close Marks

[quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous]I was poking around AES to see what teams were registered at some of the early season tournaments and noticed what appears to be another new club. Or at least one I’ve never heard of. Anyone know anything about Eclipse? 
[url]https://eclipsevball.com/[/url][/quote]
More reasonable fees than other clubs in VA, but still higher than well-established clubs in MD. I feel like they do a lot of unnecessary travel outside of the area. With the level of players they will likely get, local tournaments would be sufficient (but probably the coaches want to travel, so the players must pay up). At least they don't take their newbie teams to the qualifiers. [/quote]
Looking at the schedule, seems pretty similar to what the MVSA 1s teams do. At least everything is within driving distance.

It's interesting a new club is planning an 18s team since players who aren't continuing with volleyball in college often stop playing club to leave the second half of their senior year more free for other things. Maybe it will be more a combined 17-18s team.[/quote]

Are you going to tell me that the schedule of top MVSA teams is the standard that other clubs should follow? I would not complain if they would follow the pricing model, but... How do you justify going to the same tournaments with a rookie team? Why not follow the schedule of a regional MVSA team? Would you rather meet their top teams and get aced every other serve, or meet one of their regional team and manage to do some rallies? Some of the top MVSA teams play one age up in some tournaments because they want a better challenge than what they get at their age level. How is a rookie team in a newly formed club even comparable? [/quote]
Wasn't an endorsement or criticism of the schedule - just an observation. I think it's at least a more reasonable schedule than a new club that is planning on Big South, Music City, NEQ, etc. In my opinion, Volley By the James, CHC, and East Coast Championships are all fun tournaments and much less competitive than big qualifiers. You can see (in AES or SportWrench) Eclipse registered to play in the club division at Volley by the James and in the Select division at ECC so they aren't coming out of the gate thinking they're going to be competing with the top teams.

While I agree that a new club should start out small and build up to a more challenging schedule, I think 3 teams and all tournaments within driving distance is a lot more reasonable than other new clubs that have been discussed in this thread.

As for the pricing, it is obviously higher than MVSA or VolleyViet, but it seems like a steal compared to say Loudoun Elite, whose 16s second team has a pretty similar schedule to Eclipse's 16s for $2500 more. Maybe they have way cooler backpacks.[/quote]

I would reserve the word "steal" for the players who make MVSA or VolleyViet. You cannot say "steal" with a straight face when the parents have to fork 4-5k into a sports team. They could have come up with a regional schedule to save money and lower fees. It's not like you go somewhere and do what tourists do: you see the inside of the venue and that of the hotel room because at the end of each day you are exhausted and you may have to wake up early the next day. Which is cooler - the inside of the Richmond Convention Center or the inside of the St. James? Of course the inside of the St. James: I can drive back home, sleep in my bed, and not pay a few more hundreds of dollars for the hotel. In these circumstances, you can also lower the club fees because you don't spend money on coach travel (money that also comes from the parents). [/quote]

Options

	Disable HTML in this message
	Disable BB Code in this message
	Disable smilies in this message

Review message

Search Recent Topics Hottest Topics