Reply to LA Innocence Project takes up notorious case of convicted wife-killer Scott Peterson

Forum Index » Off-Topic

Reply to "LA Innocence Project takes up notorious case of convicted wife-killer Scott Peterson"

Subject:

Emoticons





More smilies

Text Color: Font: Close Marks

[quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous]I know that Scott Peterson did a lot of questionable things during his wife’s Laci’s disappearance as well as after her + Conner’s death.

First he claimed he played golf, then he said he actually went fishing.
He bought a new boat and Laci & Conner’s dead bodies were discovered in the area where he had been fishing.

It was also strange how he tried to sell his house as well as Laci’s vehicle shortly afterward.
And of course, having an affair while your wife is due to have your first baby is not a good look at all.

However, these are ALL circumstantial things.
Sure Scott is a lying, cheating rat of a husband.

But to convict him beyond a reasonable doubt would be actual evidence presented linking him directly to the crime.
Not simply basing his conviction on his nefarious behavior.[/quote]

He and Laci could have been in a bad stage in their marriage. Perhaps they were staying together temporarily because she was expecting. This could explain his affair and his seemingly blasé attitude after she disappeared.
And while his actions made him appear suspect to some people, they do not necessarily point to him as a cold blooded murderer.

Playing Devil’s Advocate here, while I feel Scott likely did kill his wife, I don’t know as a juror on his case if the evidence was strong enough to put him behind bars.[/quote]

Why on earth would any killer go thru the trouble of abducting a heavily pregnant woman and taking her out to sea to dispose of her body? A random killer would’ve left her in the house [/quote]

The answer to this is simple:

If Laci was a witness + saw something that could possibly indict others in a criminal matter then the criminals involved would have zero issues on murdering her, then dumping her body into a bag of water.

Especially if they were high on drugs. 🤯[/quote]

Did the burglars have access to a boat? Concrete anchors? Why go out on the water in the freezing temps to dump a body when they could literally dump her anywhere else with less effort. [/quote]

Also, why would burglars have driven 80 miles to the SF Bay to dump the body? There are plenty of rivers, canals, fields, orchards near Modesto. [/quote]

It was already in the news that Scott had been out there fishing. The burglars could have dumped the body there after they heard that information, to further incriminate Scott and avoid being caught. However I’m not sure how they would have gone about that without being noticed.[/quote]

Options

	Disable HTML in this message
	Disable BB Code in this message
	Disable smilies in this message

Review message

Search Recent Topics Hottest Topics