Reply to sex partners

Forum Index » Relationship Discussion (non-explicit)

Reply to "sex partners"

Subject:

Emoticons





More smilies

Text Color: Font: Close Marks

[quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous]Everyone is different but I will not put my Johnson in a place that 60 Johnsons were there before.  YMMV.[/quote]

Weird hangup. I shake hands with people who have shaken other hands that have, collectively, been on basically an infinity of Johnsons. But you are under no obligation to stick your body parts anywhere you don't want to. [/quote]
? you equate a hand with an intimate body part? Weird.

dp[/quote]

Parts is parts. [/quote]

Yep. And the average human hand is much dirtier than the genitals. [/quote]

No - genitalia has different flora , way more fecal and gut bacteria, leaving alone incurable STDs. You can’t get an STD from hand shake [/quote]
+1  I can use hand sanitizers after I shake hands with someone or go wash my hands.  I'm pretty sure most people aren't sanitizing their genital parts after it touches some random person's genitals.[/quote]

I see the problem, you're envisioning some lady f**king 60 dudes and never showering in between. I agree, that would be gross. [/quote]

Well, statistically speaking, the lady would have HPV never cleansing on its own from her body as it takes 6 months. She wouldn’t be taking breaks long enough between partners. Same applies to herpes: maybe she was ok doing 300 guys in the past. But now 1 in 5 is infected and condoms don’t protect from it. So if she was prostitute today, she would have both types of HSV at a min [/quote]

Why do you assume that everyone who enjoys more sexual partners than you has an STD. I've never gotten an STD and I get tested every year. Again, you're just ignorant and want to assign a moral failing to someone who dares live differently than you.[/quote]

I don’t assume it’s statistics. NIH research  on infectious deceased transmitting which is calculated by contacts per person per calendar days. The more partners the higher the exposure. Read up official recommendations: limit number of partners if you want limit your exposures. 
Why not having sex continuously with one person ? [/quote]

So the question posed by OP was whether you could be with someone knowing she had 60 sexual partners in the past. So, provided that she is clear of STDs the number doesn’t matter, correct? Or is she a shit person for the mare number of partners she had regardless of STDs? Because, sure, I’m not stupid, the higher the number of partners, the higher the probability of contracting an STD. But it certainly isn’t a moral failing to sleep around. [/quote]

I already dealt with men who had multiple partners. Just like Wyatt women, I found they have commitment issues, don’t value sex as much as I do and have different lifestyle. It’s not a question of morality but a lifestyle and whether it’s a good fit for my lifestyle. I won’t trust such a person right away for sure, and my experience as women shows these men are momentum driven, abrupt and have low tolerance to compromise. They are rarely LTR material [/quote]

What the hell are Wyatt women?

I actually think the whole premise of OPs question is idiotic. As clearly evident from the answers he got, it doesn’t matter one iota whether I would be with her (not sure, but 60 wouldn’t be the reason). It’s whether HE can be with someone who had as many partners. There is no right or wrong answer. Only preferences. [/quote]

Options

	Disable HTML in this message
	Disable BB Code in this message
	Disable smilies in this message

Review message

Search Recent Topics Hottest Topics