Reply to AAP should be eliminated as it’s not the path to equity

Forum Index » Advanced Academic Programs (AAP)

Reply to "AAP should be eliminated as it’s not the path to equity"

Subject:

Emoticons





More smilies

Text Color: Font: Close Marks

[quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous]I think we need to eliminate travel and try-out sports as well. All teams should be open to every child. Tracking by athletic ability is inequitable. [/quote]

A better analogy is that the rosters of all sports teams should be finalized by the end of second grade.  If your son sucks at basketball (which he’s never tried before) when he’s 7, he gets put in the “not an athlete” pool and only by the grace of god will he ever receive the opportunity to try again.  The fact that in middle school he’s over 6’ and has incredible hand-eye coordination is irrelevant.[/quote]

I mean, at 7, the top 2% or top 15-20% of naturally gifted athletic kids are able to be sorted.  [/quote]

And… this would be a terrible way to select a team for any competitive sport.

You DO realize that in athletics the kids (and even professional level adults!) have to make the team every single year, don’t you?  You don’t get selected after one good tryout and then have a guaranteed spot forever.  Some kids who aren’t necessarily natural athletes end up being scrappy overachievers and incredible assets to their teams, and some naturally gifted athletes just can’t or won’t perform in a competitive setting.

And academic achievement isn’t really different.  Make the “gifted” kids earn their spot every year, and allow other kids a fair chance to see if they can “overachieve” despite less than gifted IQ scores…[/quote]

New kids are found eligible past 2nd grade every year.

The “once you’re in you’re in” has its issues but it would be a logistical nightmare for kids to be moving out and then possibly back in, especially with math, so I get it.

Also? It’s not a gifted program anymore. Hasn’t been for a long time. Traditionally, gifted is top 2 1/2 percent by IQ. Nobody (or almost nobody) is claiming that’s what AAP is now. It has gifted learners IN it, and it’s how FCPS satisfies the state law for meeting the needs of gifted learners.

There are some holdovers in language— center teachers are  officially defined as “Gifted Education Teachers”— but I think that’s because it would require regulation changes to fix it and centers are probably on their way out anyway. [/quote]

Options

	Disable HTML in this message
	Disable BB Code in this message
	Disable smilies in this message

Review message

Search Recent Topics Hottest Topics