Reply to Gender Tropes, Reluctant Truths

Forum Index » Relationship Discussion (non-explicit)

Reply to "Gender Tropes, Reluctant Truths"

Subject:

Emoticons





More smilies

Text Color: Font: Close Marks

[quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous]And it's not like someone can't be a stay at home mom and also ride a motorcycle and compete in triathlons. You job is not your only means of gender roles. Lots of immature people on here. There are entire countries where everyone is not only in their gender role for their job but their entire lifestyle.[/quote]

I think it bespeaks a certain level of insecurity by certain women (or perhaps regret) when they try to denigrate the choices that other women have made just because they just so happen to conform with "traditional" gender norms. Like they are duty bound to interject themselves into other people's affairs and arrangements, lest their own preferences and choices be somehow deemed inferior. [/quote]

Cynical take: the more I see this kind of stuff the more I'm certain that 2nd -3rd wave Feminism didn't solve any real problems for women but rather shifted the primary manifestations of our anxieties [b]from anxious-attachment to avoidant-attachment[/b]. We work outside the home and earn our own income so now we don't need anyone for anything. Men are irrelevant. And we are SO CONTENT. Every relationship--even our own families--is just a battleground for power so you must position yourself accordingly. [/quote]

I guess I just don't understand the desire to constantly sh*t on other women's choices, especially if these women are content, as you suggest. Why make someone [i]else's[/i] relationship dynamics a part of your battleground? Constantly. It doesn't add up.

The whole battleground thing doesn't sound very fun or pleasant, but I guess that's life. Adjust accordingly. The bolded is a pretty interesting theory and I can definitely see a case for it, but it's also kind of sad b/c it sounds like of alienating. For everyone.

Re contentment: How does that square with the rise of anti-depressant use (women moreso than men) and the absolute and relative declines in self-reported happiness from women. Is it the case that the DCUM demo is more professionally successful and upwardly mobile, so they are not succumbing to these trends as much? There is a certain classed tenor to a statement like "men are irrelevant" that I don't think travels quite as well outside of fora like these.

You raise some interesting thoughts. I'll look into the attachment theories more.[/quote]

If you’re happy in “traditional roles”, you’re happy.

But don’t pretend like you aren’t perpetuating gender stereotypes. 
[/quote]

Would you say the same to women that expect me to pay on first dates, act chivalrous (benevolent sexism grounded in assumption about women), sign up for the draft, perform the more dangerous jobs, "fix stuff" around the house, not cry too much, etc? Many women hold these expectations and it is part of the same dynamic that reinforces female gender stereotypes.

One way deconstruction of gender stereotypes breeds a lot of resentment. [/quote]

Those women would also be perpetuating stereotypes. Absolutely. 
[/quote]

I think the point of disagreement, then, will be re: the usefulness and desirability of stereotypes. We all use them. Some are more acceptable than others. 
 
Part of the trouble might come when pattern recognition (especially decontextualized) evolves into essentialism. [/quote]

Having preconceived notions of people based solely on their sex organs isn’t helpful.

[/quote]

How do you feel about the statement "men generally pose more of a physical danger than women"?[/quote]

We can look at crime statistics and see trends. But drawing conclusions about any individual based on that data is harmful. 
[/quote]

It's not about drawing conclusions about individuals. It's about enacting safeguards and tailoring your behavior according to recognized trends (or stereotypes).

I think it is helpful when a mother tells a daughter to be a little bit more hesitant and watchful around strange men. Do you not?[/quote]

I teach all of my kids to be aware of their surroundings and to avoid putting themselves into risky situations (drunk). But I never say to be wary of strange men. That’s not something I ever heard growing up either. Very odd, fearful advice. 
[/quote]
You are doing your children a disservice. You should be teaching your children to trust their gut. I teach my children that if someone is acting strangely to stay clear. I also teach them that if there is a man who is hanging around looking like he has nothing to do or is going nowhere, to observe and steer clear there too. This advice has served us all well at the playground near our home. She knows the difference between a dad waiting for his kid outside of school and a lurker at the playground. I also teach my kids to seek help from a mother if they get lost. It's crazy to go out of your way to pretend men aren't a bigger danger than women. [/quote]

Yes, being aware of surroundings means trusting their gut and observing anything out of the ordinary. It’d also be weird if a woman was creeping at the playground.

Just because someone has a penis doesn’t automatically make them a suspect. “Men” as a category aren’t a risk. Individual people who do bad things are a risk. [b]Some are men, some are women.[/b] 
[/quote]

Are [i]more[/i] men than women, though?

The initial point was about the [i]relative[/i] danger posed by a man [i]before[/i] a dangerous act has been committed. Not the generic, nothing statements you are offering.

You are asking people to engage in the risk calculus in a particular situation after the bad thing has been done. Weird way to go about it, but whatever works for you.[/quote]

A random guy is walking down the street near me. I don’t automatically consider him a danger. Most men (and women) are not violent.

Stereotypes are causing you to live in fear of half of the population. Stereotypes stink. 
[/quote]

What part of relative do you not understand?

You're being willfully obtuse. Yawn.[/quote]

Options

	Disable HTML in this message
	Disable BB Code in this message
	Disable smilies in this message

Review message

Search Recent Topics Hottest Topics