Toggle navigation
Toggle navigation
Home
DCUM Forums
Nanny Forums
Events
About DCUM
Advertising
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics
FAQs and Guidelines
Privacy Policy
Your current identity is: Anonymous
Login
Preview
Subject:
Forum Index
»
Schools and Education General Discussion
Reply to "Is this CRT?"
Subject:
Emoticons
More smilies
Text Color:
Default
Dark Red
Red
Orange
Brown
Yellow
Green
Olive
Cyan
Blue
Dark Blue
Violet
White
Black
Font:
Very Small
Small
Normal
Big
Giant
Close Marks
[quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous]Technically no, but it’s what people are referring to when they talk about CRT in k-12 education. A lot of parents don’t think public schools should teach students to be “agents of social change”. They expect their kids to be taught skills like math and reading, and [b]facts like[/b] science and [b]social studies. [/b] Creating social change agents seems outside of that mission. [/quote] This is where it gets hairy. A lot of what's being taught in social studies is not facts but someone's interpretation of facts, especially in k-12. [/quote] +1[/quote] Parents want social studies to be as uncontroversial as possible until maybe high school. Facts like George Washington was our first president isn’t very controversial. Explaining how the three branches of government work isn’t very controversial. A lot of people feel heavier topics like race discussions should wait until high school. People don’t want to see it in elementary school. Elementary schools shouldn’t be a battleground.[/quote] Our entire US history is about race. Race and class. And no it is not an interpretation. The only battleground has to do with those who can't understand that. We hold these truths to be self-evident, that all men are created equal, that they are endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable Rights, that among these are Life, Liberty and the pursuit of Happiness. It kind of starts there, right? *Men *All men liberty *Rights *Life [/quote] That is absolutely an interpretation. One I would venture most Americans disagree with (that our county’s ENTIRE history is about race). [/quote] Ok, Let's go over it again: [b]Men[/b]- not all men. And no women [b]All men liberty[/b]- Some men did not have liberty. In fact, black men and women did not have liberty. Indigenous people had no liberty, or land. [b]Rights[/b]- White land owning men. Not black men, not Indigenous men, not women. Were there religious rights? No. [b]Life-[/b]What about black men? Were they guaranteed their lives? No. [/quote] In your own answer you talk about sex, religion, & wealth. While maintaining that the “entire” history is about race. [/quote] [i]Let's go over it again. Listen up. [/i] [b]Men[/b]- the gender of only [b]man[/b], not women, who are given [b]rights[/b], by God, not [b]black men[/b] or [b]black women[/b], not [b]women[/b], not [b]indigenous men or women. [/b]That's the white male interpretation of [b]religion[/b]. It's [b]not[/b][i] about [b]sex[/b], it's not about [b]religion[/b], and it's about who [b]white Christian men decide who has rights and wealth. [/b] because they have decided what God wants. Because you don't understand this is why this needs to be taught in schools. [/quote] DP. Are you still arguing about this? You were shown to be wrong. You are also showing us why this conversation is so difficult - some people think that everything can be and should be about race, whether it actually is or not. [/quote] I am not wrong. At all. Your problem is that you don't think race enters into our history, but our history has race issues weaved within the entire scope and sequence. One cannot teach history without teaching how we got here. What do you think history is about? I can't imagine [/quote] This is about as stupid as someone saying the single only most important fact of our history is the Mexican War, or the Louisiana Purchase, or the Gold Rush, or the Indian Wars, or the anti-Chinese Acts. Hint: Enough with race and racism.[/quote] This country wouldn't even exist without colonialism, without slave labor, without the annilhation of cultures . If you think that doesn't belong in a classroom, what does according to you? The Indian Wars- not about racism? Mexican Wars? You mean when we took it? Do you know the history of the Louisiana Purchase? Why it happened? Who lived in that territory? So, yes, race plays a role in even your examples? You need to go back to school. [/quote] Honey, I might need to go back to school. But you need to START school. It's quite obvious where you stand -- third grade in a DC school where MLK is presented as Jesus?[/quote] Again, you need to be educated before you post. [/quote] That PP is right. You view everything through the lens of race. But there is more to the world than that. You're wearing blinkers.[/quote] Do you mean blinders? Lol. Go away sock puppet troll. You are the PP. This is above your cognitive attainment. :roll: [/quote]
Options
Disable HTML in this message
Disable BB Code in this message
Disable smilies in this message
Review message
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics