Toggle navigation
Toggle navigation
Home
DCUM Forums
Nanny Forums
Events
About DCUM
Advertising
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics
FAQs and Guidelines
Privacy Policy
Your current identity is: Anonymous
Login
Preview
Subject:
Forum Index
»
College and University Discussion
Reply to "WSJ article on your child's chances of getting into an IVY are slim"
Subject:
Emoticons
More smilies
Text Color:
Default
Dark Red
Red
Orange
Brown
Yellow
Green
Olive
Cyan
Blue
Dark Blue
Violet
White
Black
Font:
Very Small
Small
Normal
Big
Giant
Close Marks
[quote=Anonymous]Wouldn’t you want your kid to attend school with a mix of old-money blue bloods, the well-connected, super-duper smarties, the already well-accomplished, and a few under-privileged kids who may not come in with the tip top creds but are likely to thrive? Seems like a good mix. Fact is, a few unhooked kids do get into these schools and that they are surrounded by the mix described above is certainly to their advantage versus one based on hard metrics alone. Of course it’s all academic if your unhooked kid is dinged, but I reason that the experience of the unhooked admits is no less a valid consideration than the unfortunate many rejects. I mean, if you manage to get in, you kind of want Harvard to be, well…“Harvard,” bastion of elite privilege and all, right? Why else are we dying to get in? Sorry, but if my unhooked kids got into Harvard (fat chance), you better believe I want them to have well-connected old money peers! New money peers are great too! Fellow unhooked students are fine, but they aren’t really doing much for my kids. [/quote]
Options
Disable HTML in this message
Disable BB Code in this message
Disable smilies in this message
Review message
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics