Toggle navigation
Toggle navigation
Home
DCUM Forums
Nanny Forums
Events
About DCUM
Advertising
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics
FAQs and Guidelines
Privacy Policy
Your current identity is: Anonymous
Login
Preview
Subject:
Forum Index
»
Political Discussion
Reply to "Ketanji Brown Jackson confirmation hearing"
Subject:
Emoticons
More smilies
Text Color:
Default
Dark Red
Red
Orange
Brown
Yellow
Green
Olive
Cyan
Blue
Dark Blue
Violet
White
Black
Font:
Very Small
Small
Normal
Big
Giant
Close Marks
[quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous]The refusal to define something as simple as a woman is clearly a political one. After all, you can just as easily say "I'm not a mathematician" when someone asks you what is 2+2. If you did that, everyone would assume you're either a) stupid or b) childishly obtuse. I don't know what she privately thinks in her mind, but she knows what the masters of the Democratic Party have ordained. There is no independence of thought among Democrats. You comply with what is ordained or suffer their wrath. [/quote] Well said. It’s disappointing, to say the least, that she feels she has to stick to the party narrative.[/quote] This is not an independently thinking person; this is a party hack.[/quote] Clarence Thomas started the conga line of party hacks into the Supreme Court. And if you don't get that the last three "Federalist Society" justices were bought and paid for, I don't know what to tell you.[/quote]
Options
Disable HTML in this message
Disable BB Code in this message
Disable smilies in this message
Review message
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics
