Reply to Getting shammed for getting engaged at 22

Forum Index » Relationship Discussion (non-explicit)

Reply to "Getting shammed for getting engaged at 22"

Subject:

Emoticons





More smilies

Text Color: Font: Close Marks

[quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous]IMO, “young” weddings (wherein bride and groom are under 27 or so and, importantly, NOT PREGNANT) are the happiest and most optimistic. They tend to be visibly giddy and madly in love and make you believe they have the best chance of still being together 50 years later.

You know that no one is “settling” if they get married under 27. They’re there because they genuinely want to be not because everyone else is doing it or they’re worried about their aging ovaries.[/quote]

Dumbest post of the day.[/quote]

Np. Parts of this are so true. People worry so much about the young weddings. And instead it’s the older weddings that are so worrisome. Lots of my friends rushed to the altar at 30-37 and many were very unhappy and divorced soon. Many young couples (22-27) have genuinely found their mate in line and should be supported. [/quote]

Every single person I know who married under the age of 27 did so because they thought it was the adult thing to do and were in a rush to be settled by 25 so they could have kids at 30 and are all divorced now and on marriage # 2  after marriage to their soulmate didn't work out.

As I said  , pp's post was incredibly stupid and the same old crap spewed about people who marry over 30.[/quote]

The data backs this. Marrying under the age of 25 has much higher divorce rates than these "worrisome" 30 somethings. [/quote]

Options

	Disable HTML in this message
	Disable BB Code in this message
	Disable smilies in this message

Review message

Search Recent Topics Hottest Topics