Toggle navigation
Toggle navigation
Home
DCUM Forums
Nanny Forums
Events
About DCUM
Advertising
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics
FAQs and Guidelines
Privacy Policy
Your current identity is: Anonymous
Login
Preview
Subject:
Forum Index
»
Relationship Discussion (non-explicit)
Reply to "Getting shammed for getting engaged at 22"
Subject:
Emoticons
More smilies
Text Color:
Default
Dark Red
Red
Orange
Brown
Yellow
Green
Olive
Cyan
Blue
Dark Blue
Violet
White
Black
Font:
Very Small
Small
Normal
Big
Giant
Close Marks
[quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous]IMO, “young” weddings (wherein bride and groom are under 27 or so and, importantly, NOT PREGNANT) are the happiest and most optimistic. They tend to be visibly giddy and madly in love and make you believe they have the best chance of still being together 50 years later. You know that no one is “settling” if they get married under 27. They’re there because they genuinely want to be not because everyone else is doing it or they’re worried about their aging ovaries.[/quote] Dumbest post of the day.[/quote] Np. Parts of this are so true. People worry so much about the young weddings. And instead it’s the older weddings that are so worrisome. Lots of my friends rushed to the altar at 30-37 and many were very unhappy and divorced soon. Many young couples (22-27) have genuinely found their mate in line and should be supported. [/quote]
Options
Disable HTML in this message
Disable BB Code in this message
Disable smilies in this message
Review message
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics
