Reply to Friend just announced her junior DD has committed to play lax at a top school

Forum Index » College and University Discussion

Reply to "Friend just announced her junior DD has committed to play lax at a top school"

Subject:

Emoticons





More smilies

Text Color: Font: Close Marks

[quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous]Everyone of these parents complaining about this would happily accept the preferred athletic treatment if their kid was offered it.  [/quote]

Maybe, but I'd at least acknowledge the preferential treatment, which some people seem unable to do here.  All I see is protests of sour grapes, they work hard, it's just as stressful for athletes just in other ways, it's just the same as another other EC.....

My kid is a double legacy at a top school which definitely gives special treatment to legacies.  Who knows if that will be in place by the time my kid gets to applying, but I freely acknowledge that it is unfair and there is no justification for it at all.  Despite the fact that I might benefit, for the system as a whole, I don't think it makes sense.

Can parents of student athletes do the same?[/quote]

[b]Can you see the difference? [/b]Your kid did nothing to achieve double legacy status. It is purely his or her good luck to have been born to parents who attended the school and made donations. An athlete trains for years to achieve a chance at being recruited. That's hard work, not pure luck.

I'm not arguing that the system is fair, but those two admissions preferences aren't comparable. [/quote]

She can't. The fact that PP can't understand the hard work, sacrifice, discipline, and value of athletics is very scary. To think that's an unfair advantage and being an athlete is an unfair advantage is truly insane.[/quote]

The fact that you think athletics has some sort of monopoly over hard work, sacrifice and discipline that other ECs (which don't get the same admissions preference) don't is insane.  
[/quote]

I was comparing the advantage of being an athlete vs being a legacy. Quite accurately. A recruited athlete has more value and is more deserving than a legacy. All day long.

Other ECs require those qualities and that's great. My point wasn't that other ECs don't require them. It was that being a legacy does not.

Colleges are allowed to have priorities, just like you are. They also invest more to recruit professors in comp sci compared to classics. So what?

-Mom of legacy kids with no athletic ability
[/quote]

Your job is to provide connections! Step up babe! 😂[/quote]

What does this mean?[/quote]

Legacies get preferential treatment because going to a top school is important for connections. Legacies are the connections. That is how it works. [/quote]

Options

	Disable HTML in this message
	Disable BB Code in this message
	Disable smilies in this message

Review message

Search Recent Topics Hottest Topics