Toggle navigation
Toggle navigation
Home
DCUM Forums
Nanny Forums
Events
About DCUM
Advertising
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics
FAQs and Guidelines
Privacy Policy
Your current identity is: Anonymous
Login
Preview
Subject:
Forum Index
»
Fairfax County Public Schools (FCPS)
Reply to "Future Western High School"
Subject:
Emoticons
More smilies
Text Color:
Default
Dark Red
Red
Orange
Brown
Yellow
Green
Olive
Cyan
Blue
Dark Blue
Violet
White
Black
Font:
Very Small
Small
Normal
Big
Giant
Close Marks
[quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous]Not nearly as much as the giant hissy fit that the Langley parents threw in 2019 after Janie Strauss stated publicly that "I've warned Langley, sorry, a big chunk is going to get reboundaried [when the new HS is built]." https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=iM4AfGQqTWE [/quote] It's very clear if you watch the actual work sessions that the school board was talking about changing boundaries for race/class reasons. They weren't discussing the new high school. Jane Strauss mentioned Langley specifically so parents from that pyramid had every right to inform the school board that they disagreed with changing schools because the board saw fit to rearrange schools by class and race. It was too close to an election to press forward with their plans to redo boundary policy to prioritize class/racial makeup of the schools, as Langley pyramid parents weren't the only ones who realized that their kids could be sent to different schools based on their race and class. Instead of standing up and telling the community that it would be great to rearrange kids based on their immutable characteristics and their parents bank account, and they believed in this and were going to pass the policy anyway, they backed down. They amended the CIP at the last minute to send children from overcrowded Mclean to Langley, which had space. They had to do that to demonstrate that they were not holding Mclean, 2 miles away (ish) overcrowded because Langley had space because they wanted to spread those kids around to other schools based on race and class. Anyone who actually watched the work sessions knows that that is exactly what they are doing, as a new boundary could have easily been timed to coincide with the conclusion of Langley's renovation in 2018. As to the Western High School which looks like it will finally be built in the next few years, new schools obviously mean new boundaries. It's perfectly reasonable to expect that the Langley boundary might be impacted. It will be interesting to see which areas would be proposed to replace those removed, but we will have to wait and see. So they stopped working on policy, placated parents, and got their desired result: Dem-endorsed incumbents kept their seats and the last two Rep-endorsed candidates lost theirs to Dems.[/quote] Whoops. Let me rearrange that a bit. ----- It's very clear if you watch the actual work sessions that the school board was talking about changing boundaries for race/class reasons. They weren't discussing the planned new high school. Jane Strauss mentioned Langley specifically so parents from that pyramid had every right to inform the school board that they disagreed with changing schools because the board saw fit to rearrange schools by class and race. It was too close to an election to press forward with their plans to redo boundary policy to prioritize class/racial makeup of the schools, as Langley pyramid parents weren't the only ones who realized that their kids could be sent to different schools based on their race and class. Instead of standing up and telling the community that it would be great to rearrange kids based on their immutable characteristics and their parents' bank accounts, and they believed in this and were going to pass the policy anyway, they backed down. They amended the CIP at the last minute to send children from overcrowded Mclean to Langley, which had space. They had to do that to demonstrate that they were not holding Mclean, 2 miles away (ish) overcrowded because Langley had space because they wanted to spread those kids around to other schools based on race and class. Anyone who actually watched the work sessions knows that that is exactly what they are doing, as a new boundary could have easily been timed to coincide with the conclusion of Langley's renovation in 2018. So the school board stopped working on policy, placated parents, and got their desired result: Dem-endorsed incumbents kept their seats and the last two Rep-endorsed candidates lost theirs to Dems. As to the Western High School which looks like it will finally be built in the next few years, new schools obviously mean new boundaries. It's perfectly reasonable to expect that the Langley boundary might be impacted. It will be interesting to see which areas would be proposed to replace those removed, but we will have to wait and see. [/quote] Don’t forget Langley was one of the identified schools that would be impacted.[/quote]
Options
Disable HTML in this message
Disable BB Code in this message
Disable smilies in this message
Review message
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics