Toggle navigation
Toggle navigation
Home
DCUM Forums
Nanny Forums
Events
About DCUM
Advertising
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics
FAQs and Guidelines
Privacy Policy
Your current identity is: Anonymous
Login
Preview
Subject:
Forum Index
»
Off-Topic
Reply to "MN Police Shoot and Kill Daunte Wright"
Subject:
Emoticons
More smilies
Text Color:
Default
Dark Red
Red
Orange
Brown
Yellow
Green
Olive
Cyan
Blue
Dark Blue
Violet
White
Black
Font:
Very Small
Small
Normal
Big
Giant
Close Marks
[quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous]The dash cam footage is out. It’s bad. She thought she had a taser. [/quote] I think the body cam footage is quite exculpatory. He wrestled out of handcuffs (!!! Why???) and she followed procedure for taser. She clearly had no lethal intent. If he had stayed instead of driving off, they could have administered first aid and maybe saved him. Sorry, but he’s the start for each thing that went wrong here. [/quote] It’s horrible, but he should have not fled. [/quote] It’s horrible but they should not have fought him. They could easily picked him up later.[/quote] This isn't a complex thought: [b]Police should not shoot anyone running away from them[/b]. Ever. [/quote] +1 The Supreme a court ruled on this before this officer was even born. It should not keep happening.[/quote] Incorrect. Officers can fire at subjects while running away in several situations, including notably when they are fleeing the scene of a violent felony and/or fleeing the scene armed in an attempt to gain cover. You really think officers can’t fire at a man they saw shoot someone and run away? Just think it through people, it’s not that hard. [/quote] +1 [b]Are the other posters trolls or just ignorant? [/b]A police officer can absolutely shoot someone fleeing if they have prob cause to believe that they pose a deadly threat or a threat of great bodily harm to the community if they escape. The supreme court ruled on this about 35 years ago in Tennesse vs Garner. Another relevant case for use of force would be Graham vs. Connor. But you would probably rather ramble on about your political/SJW nonsense.[/quote] No. The other posters aren't trolls or ignorant. They are replying to the facts in this case. What you said is irrelevant to this situation. You sound like an ignorant troll.[/quote] Soccer mom adding no substance as usual. At least you didnt ramble on about racism endlessly.[/quote]
Options
Disable HTML in this message
Disable BB Code in this message
Disable smilies in this message
Review message
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics