Toggle navigation
Toggle navigation
Home
DCUM Forums
Nanny Forums
Events
About DCUM
Advertising
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics
FAQs and Guidelines
Privacy Policy
Your current identity is: Anonymous
Login
Preview
Subject:
Forum Index
»
Montgomery County Public Schools (MCPS)
Reply to "Magnet Middle School Thread: MAP scores and results"
Subject:
Emoticons
More smilies
Text Color:
Default
Dark Red
Red
Orange
Brown
Yellow
Green
Olive
Cyan
Blue
Dark Blue
Violet
White
Black
Font:
Very Small
Small
Normal
Big
Giant
Close Marks
[quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous]Here's a (hopefully correct) summary of Fall MAP scores reported in this thread so far. Although maybe we are all focusing too much on Fall MAP scores, but there really aren't a lot of other data points to consider. MAP-M and Math magnet results: 232 - not in pool 234 - not in pool 242 - in pool 244 - in pool (selected) 245 - in pool 252 - in pool (selected) 255 - not in pool 255 - in pool 262 - in pool 268 - in pool 272 - in pool (and in-bounds for TPMS, but not selected) 283 - in pool MAP-R and Humanities magnet results: 235 - in pool 235 - in pool 237 - in pool 238 - in pool 239- in pool (selected) 240- not in pool 240 - in pool 240 - in pool 240 - in pool 245 - in pool 245 - in pool 256 - in pool[/quote] Thanks for compiling PP. It looks like they may have used the 240 cut-off for TPMS. This has been the traditional recommendation line for AIM in 6th, however it is not the Fall test that they usually consider. Interesting.[/quote] Add 240 map M and NOT in pool. [/quote] There goes another theory! Any Bs in math? [/quote] I wonder if they did do cutoffs by each school or type of school (like the CogAT percentiles). 240 is the 98%ile in the Fall, so that is a pretty steep cut-off for a lottery (not saying it shouldn't be steep, but for MCPS that is surprisingly steep). [/quote] As they said MAP is one of several factors that are weighed there's likely not a hard cutoff but a score that is derived from a combination of those things that determines pool eligibility.[/quote] Last year my child had higher map scores than all of these and only got waitlisted for one. It makes zero sense how they do it.[/quote] Your child's MAP M was over 283? And they didnt get into Takoma? I call BS.[/quote] I heard this happened last year so I'm apt to believe it. It could be kids with similar profiles with higher Cogat. [/quote] If they were in the pool they had the same chance as anyone else, but it stands to reason that fewer outliers will be selected since well there are fewer of them in the pool..[/quote]
Options
Disable HTML in this message
Disable BB Code in this message
Disable smilies in this message
Review message
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics