Reply to "I support the teachers" people

Forum Index » DC Public and Public Charter Schools

Reply to ""I support the teachers" people"

Subject:

Emoticons





More smilies

Text Color: Font: Close Marks

[quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote]And the constant pretending that school's only role is to provide a method for a teacher to broadcast information to students as though teaching and not learning was the more important activity. That it's childrens' and parents' fault if the kids aren't effectively learning in this situation. That schools have no other social roles, including community health, civic education, socialized daycare, socialization, community building and integration, etc.

No. Schools are simply a method for teachers to teach. And if kids aren't learning, well, it doesn't matter if the teachers say they're working hard enough.

[/quote]

This is well-put. If we all start this discussion in agreement that in-person learning works best for all students, then we should end the discussion in agreement that long-term DL does not work for all students. we agree. If we want to decide that the safety of adults in school buildings is more important than educating children due to the circumstances of the pandemic, then we should be honest about it. We are sorry that we are providing a sub-par educational experience for your children, but we think the risk of getting sick outweighs any and all concerns about education. That way, there is nothing to argue about. It is what it is.[/quote]

Well, I would say we can still argue about the ethical merits of prioritizing the interests of adults over those of children, and more broadly, the interests of the elderly over the young. It is an important issue that should be at the core of our larger discussion about how to live with this virus.[/quote]

Absolutely, there is room for disagreement in how we prioritize interests, without being dismissive of the any concerns about risks, whether they are health risks or risk to the education or development of children. You and I can have a meaningful discussion about the ethics of how these interests are prioritized Absolutely. I just wish more people would use undisputed facts to frame the analysis.

PS - I realize that the childcare person is a troll. [/quote]

The problem is that the question how significant the risk to the non-elderly teacher without comorbidities actually is isn't a matter of undisputed facts. To the contrary, there is a lot of dispute about that. I think we can all agree that the risk to teachers is not zero, but evidently people cannot agree how big it actually is. So it's not quite as easy to boil it down to the questions of interests and ethics outlined above.[/quote]

I guess that's true. However, not every teacher will get COVID and even those who get COVID may not get sick. Every student is impacted in some way by not going to school. At least that's one way of looking at it.[/quote]

I completely agree with you and believe that a) the data out of Europe shows that teachers are not at a particularly high risk to get infected, and b) if they do get infected and fall into the non-elderly, non-comorbid category, their risk of severe disease is very low. I was just pointing out that people cannot agree on this. Even though I personally think those are facts, they are not undisputed, and that is at the core of our calamity. The level of Covid hysteria is very high and has been stoked for months in response to Trump's irresponsible downplaying of it, and in an effort to get the general population to comply with measures that are important to protect the vulnerable. So while to me, the ethical calculation is clear - the risk of damage to millions of kids should outweigh the risk to teachers, many teachers believe that they are all truly risking their lives by stepping into a classroom, even if there is no evidence that this is the case (unless you are unable to put risks in perspective, since the risk is non-zero as it is in most of life).[/quote]

Emotion gets in the way of reasonable discussion. In addition, when we are talking about continuing with DL versus in person return, one side is expressing their actual experience while the other is speculating about potential risks. I have heard from so many parents that their formerly strong students are failing their DL classes, or have fallen into a state of depression, or fight with them every day about staying engaged online. And the other side is worried about what happens if a student sneezes while eating lunch and then touches touches something that the teacher touches who then touches his or her face (even though that shouldn't happen with masks and  handwashing) who then gets COVID and then maybe gets sick and then dies. There are so many "what ifs" that teachers want addressed and it is impossible to do so. That's why decision makers should either say that no risk is acceptable or start actively refusing to acknowledge concerns that are not reasonable.

I originally wanted to err on the side of safety, but the longer this drags on, the harm to students continues with little concession by teachers. At some point, I think the actual harm to children should outweigh fear and hypothetical risk.  However, this is a pandemic. It is ok to be wrong. There are no perfect choices, because everyone is hurt in some way. More than anything, I wish we could all be more honest about how we are assessing risk.  [/quote]

Teachers don't make the decisions but their health and safety is important as it is ours.  You can find people on both sides but if things aren't working in your home, you need to support your kids and figure it out.  Many parents are very laid back and let the kids handle things and many of those kids aren't as independent as parents believe they are.[/quote]

I control what goes on in my home, that's true. However, those in charge of educating children are responsible for assessing the approach that promotes the greater good. Those people have as much, if not more, responsibility to the students they serve than they do to adult staff members. They decide how to prioritize, but it is there decisions that are being discuss here, not what goes on in any individual home.[/quote]

They are providing an education.  The issue is its not the education you want.   You are willing to risk others safety without any concern for anyone else but yourself.  That is really selfish and you clearly need someone to prioritize priorities and help you parent as you aren't able to make and teach your kids responsible choices at this point.

Schools are required to provide an education.  That is what they are tasked with.  Preforming your duties as a parent - child care, socialization, exercise, extra stuff, mental health, etc are your responsibilities as a parent.  And, your responsibility is to make sure your kids attend their classes, participate and do the school work regardless of DL or in person.[/quote]

And yet at this moment, schools are not providing an education to a significant majority of students. What they are providing is teaching. And teaching and learning (or "receiving an education") are not the same things.[/quote]

Options

	Disable HTML in this message
	Disable BB Code in this message
	Disable smilies in this message

Review message

Search Recent Topics Hottest Topics