Reply to Lindsay Graham being called out on Twitter for hiring male sex workers

Forum Index » Political Discussion

Reply to "Lindsay Graham being called out on Twitter for hiring male sex workers"

Subject:

Emoticons





More smilies

Text Color: Font: Close Marks

[quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous]Interesting

[twitter]https://twitter.com/donwinslow/status/1269216946962132993[/twitter][/quote]

Trump is a provocateur who says things to rile people up.  If the people of SC were to have an issue with LG being gay we would have known that the first 5B times this rumor was passed around.  Literally no one who is anyone in the GOP cares.  [/quote]

When the pictures come out, they'll care.[/quote]

Those southern have never heard the rumors. The media is tightly controlled in the southern states. The people of SC are too dumb to question if Lindsay is gay. He is just a Bachelor who likes hanging out with all the conservatives guys. Look how right he is on all the issues and he agree with trump on everything. [/quote]

Seriously. Those rumors don't penetrate the bubble of regular Republican voters. If it's not on FOX or Limbaugh or similar, they have no idea.[/quote]

Are CNN et al going with the "gay rumors"?  No?  Where do hear these rumors - Twitter nobodies?  Look at the OP of this thread, trying to use some tweets to prove... something.  And look at all of you, eating it up.  Liberals actually consider salacious rumor to be fact.  Shameful.[/quote]
But a few pages ago Republicans were claiming that everyone, simply EVERYONE knew Lindsey Graham was gay. So which is it - an open secret or... something something salacious?

You about all crapped your pants with glee when that Florida politician was found with a gay sex worker. Is it just that the meth is missing in Lindsey’s alleged buying sex from gay escorts, or are you just intellectually inconsistent? [/quote]

I'll explain this slowly to you, since you're having great difficulty understanding.  That LG could be gay isn't salacious.  It's a private matter that you're not entitled to know about, either way.  The salacious part has to do with rumors about soliciting sex - RUMORS.  Again, no proof whatsoever.  You're trying to smear him with salacious rumors.  Do you have any actual proof of anything nefarious having to do with LG?  NO?  Then STFU, to borrow a well-loved phrase used by DCUM's finest.

As for Andrew Gillum, there was plenty of PROOF of his involvement with not only a sex worker, but also illegal drugs.  Not sure how you could possibly equate his situation to this one, which is made up *entirely* of rumors.  No proof whatsoever.[/quote]

Options

	Disable HTML in this message
	Disable BB Code in this message
	Disable smilies in this message

Review message

Search Recent Topics Hottest Topics