Reply to It appears Bolton's book undercuts Trump's defense

Forum Index » Political Discussion

Reply to "It appears Bolton's book undercuts Trump's defense"

Subject:

Emoticons





More smilies

Text Color: Font: Close Marks

[quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous]My god you people are dumb.

ALL that matters is what he knows. We need documentary evidence to back up his verbal claims.

Do you not understand that someone you can otherwise revile can still be relevant to a trial?

Ever heard of mobsters turning state's witness? You think everyone involved in those cases suddenly LOVED those guys? No. They just knew things, so the prosecution mined their knowledge and got evidence from them. [/quote]

So Bolton was honest and truthful always? [/quote]

Huh?! No. Of course not.

That's why you request DOCUMENTARY EVIDENCE to back up his claims. You look to see whether his claims and the surrounding evidence corroborate testimony from other witnesses. It's called BUILDING A CASE.

Have you NEVER had to put an argument together? [/quote]
 Bolton was excruciating process oriented. And documented everything. It may not be enough to sway GOP now (hard to see evidence when your head is in the sand) but it will all come out eventually.

Mitch’s plan to ignore and hope it will go down memory hole was pre-Twitter. Everything is forever.[/quote]

We're seeing evidence of SOME GOP senators shifting on the question of calling witnesses even now.

Romney and Collins have said they most likely will vote for witnesses -- a slight solidification of their position.

Perhaps most notably, Graham said "Bolton may be a relevant witness."

It's also worth pointing out that Bolton's PAC has donated to 10 GOP Senators, so they're likely hesitant to piss him off. [/quote]

Options

	Disable HTML in this message
	Disable BB Code in this message
	Disable smilies in this message

Review message

Search Recent Topics Hottest Topics