Toggle navigation
Toggle navigation
Home
DCUM Forums
Nanny Forums
Events
About DCUM
Advertising
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics
FAQs and Guidelines
Privacy Policy
Your current identity is: Anonymous
Login
Preview
Subject:
Forum Index
»
Real Estate
Reply to "Cities with No Children"
Subject:
Emoticons
More smilies
Text Color:
Default
Dark Red
Red
Orange
Brown
Yellow
Green
Olive
Cyan
Blue
Dark Blue
Violet
White
Black
Font:
Very Small
Small
Normal
Big
Giant
Close Marks
[quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous] It's not a false equivalency because, in both cases, the idea is that if you help rich people, eventually average people will benefit too. Also, not to point out the obvious, but if you actually did make housing cheaper, by increasing the supply (which would take a huge increase in the supply) [b]more people would just move here[/b] and bid the price of housing back up. Prices would not actually go down. You'd just end up with a more crowded city. [/quote] Why? As for more crowded city: 1900 278,718 1910 331,069 1920 437,571 1930 486,869 1940 663,091 1950 802,178 1960 763,956 1970 756,510 1980 638,333 1990 606,900 2000 572,059 2010 601,723 2017 693,972 So I think there's room. The city isn't full.[/quote] I KNOW! Why have all these people convinced themselves that there is an affordable housing crisis? It's bizarre. The city is way smaller than it used to be. [/quote]
Options
Disable HTML in this message
Disable BB Code in this message
Disable smilies in this message
Review message
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics
