Reply to ICE Raids

Forum Index » Political Discussion

Reply to "ICE Raids"

Subject:

Emoticons





More smilies

Text Color: Font: Close Marks

[quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous]
It’s a big country. With very low unemployment. And not full.

We find a permanent, legal, status for DACA kids that includes a pathway to citizenship

We find a permanent, legal status for people who have been here a certain length of time, say ten years, can pass an English and civics tests, and have never been convicted of a crime. They get the equivalent of a green card, renewable every 5 years, so long as they are [b]self supporting[/b] and don’t [b]commit any crimes[/b]. They pay into social security, and get retirement out, but at half the rate than American citizens.  They can enter the diversity lottery while in the US.  But unless they make it to the front of the line, they are never eligible for citizenship.
[/quote]

We literally have state governments providing social service benefits,  free health care, and ICE-avoidance-assistance to illegal aliens right now, including not working with ICE for illegals caught committing crimes, and you think the government will be able to deport people that are not able to support themselves and commit crimes in the future? LMAO. How unrealistically naive can you be?

[quote=Anonymous]
We do a massive hiring of immigration judges. And attorneys/ law clerks/ decision writers and paralegals to support them.  And we allow them to hold tele-hearings, so we can get competent mid career people who don’t want to move to the border. We place a very high priority on streamlining cases and clearing the backlog.  We get processing times down to weeks or months, instead of years. We allow,one continuance only, to get documents or get a lawyer. After that, we hold the hearing.

We pay EAJA fees to lawyers who represent immigrants who make SUCCESSFUL asylum claims. Having a lawyer involved speeds up the process enormously, makes it much easier to get paperwork, and takes a lot of the burden off the judges.

We don’t detain families— or anyone— for longer than it takes to process their asylum claims, unless we have reason to believe they are dangerous. Or the children are in danger. [b]We release the[/b], into the community, with electronic monitoring of the adults aif necessary.  We also give them work visas that must be renewed in person every 3 months. They pay into social security and get nothing out unless their asylum claim is granted. Their residences are spot checked, and if they move without telling immigration, they lose the work visa.  We allow them to buy at least catastrophic medical insurance. 
[/quote]

All this does is create a constant stream of future DACA-like population. This is not a solution. Who is going to fund the massive amount of electronic monitoring bracelets that will be needed? And it's not like the electronic monitoring bracelet can't be removed and discarded in a dumpster somewhere. Where do you go to find the person that is going to disappear and become undocumented?

[quote=Anonymous]
People who lose an asylum claim are promptly deported. If they come back, they have no right to do through the asylum process again. They get one expedited hearing with a Judge prior to being released to demonstrate that something significant has changed.  If they can’t, they are immediately deported. They don’t get a third chance.

We treat the people we hold at least as well American prisoners.  A cot, even if they are sharing a sleeping space with a couple dozen men.   3 meals a day (even if they are powdered eggs), a toothbrush, a couple showers a week, clean jumpsuits on a regular basis, emergency medical,care and an hour our of rec time each day. We require them to work 8 hours a day. We permit them to take classes in English and civics.

We hold CPB and ICE to the same standards as every other federal employee. They treat people with respect, they cut it out with the secret Facebook groups, they stop intentionally degrading behavior towards immigrants. Or the lose their jobs.

We treat visa overstays and birth tourism as problems that are as severe as illegal border crossings, because numerically, they are.

We make e-verify mandatory.

[b]We invest in 21 st century technology to prevent illegal crossings. Drones with heat sensing technology. Virtual fencing. But, no wall. [/b]

So.  Now I have answered your question. This is WHERE I SUGGEST  THE IMMIGRANTS GO.  But Repubics would hate it, because it’s not punitive enough.

Any more questions?  [/quote]

There are some places where drones may work, especially in very remote areas where it would take a long time for someone crossing the border to reach a populated area to blend in. This will provide time for a response team to intercept the group. But for borders that are close to structures, private residences, towns, and other population centers, walls are the best. [/quote]

Options

	Disable HTML in this message
	Disable BB Code in this message
	Disable smilies in this message

Review message

Search Recent Topics Hottest Topics