Reply to DC School Report Cards are up

Forum Index » DC Public and Public Charter Schools

Reply to "DC School Report Cards are up"

Subject:

Emoticons





More smilies

Text Color: Font: Close Marks

[quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote] So, the way this is weighed, white kids scoring quite a bit lower than expected/average on PARCC does pretty much nothing to the ranking of the school. Yu Ying getting a score in the 90's with a white kid score of 41. Even though it is 30% white. [/quote]
Maybe you understand this, but [b]just to clarify, it doesn’t mean the white kids’ score are objectively very low. It just means that they are lower compared to other white kids across the district.[/b] [b] The other population groups far exceed the scores for their relevant populations.[/b] And scores are just one factor in the mix.

[/quote]

This is important!  [/quote]

Agreed this is important.  Taking CMI, for example, to pick on just one school that's been mentioned--it doesn't mean that the white kids at the school are doing horribly.  It just means that they aren't doing as well as expected, relative to their counterparts at other schools.[/quote]

[b]Sure. Since I have a white kid, though, this matters to me. I don't really want my kid at a school where the white kids are doing worse than average, do I? Just like any other subgroup may have the same feeling about a school which does not do well in their demographic.[/b]

But, I understood that already - I know white kids are still overall going to score fairly well. My point was that this star system is HEAVILY weighted toward the progress of disabled (for some reason more than any other group by far), and secondarily weighted by at risk etc.

FINE&gt; BUT, parents will simply read it as &quot;this is the average score of the school relative to every other school&quot;. So there is no strong emphasis. Maybe it should be called STAR Rankings for Underperforming Demographics in DCPS and Charter Schools. But it isn't.

The weighting also appears to have little to do with the population in the school of any one demographic - ie, if the school is largely white, shouldn't their underperformance (yes, relative to expectation) be quite a bit more apparent in the scoring?

I'd love to see Bowser take to the powerpoint and explain all this convoluted math to parents in DC in some kind of town halls.[/quote]

Agree with this. So how do you ask your school about this without seeming to be racist?  Because at the end of the day, at our school,  it appears that my (white) kids are not performing as well as they should be, even though the oldest got a 4 on both areas of PARCC.  Would they have gotten a 5 at a school where white kids performed better, based on expectations of how white kids should have performed.  Every subgroup should be asking this question.  [/quote]

At a few schools I've looked at, white students are lagging in some of the "minor" categories, including attendance. So dig in and look at every measure.

Are you in a school where there aren't many white students, particularly in testing grades or just a small school overall? Small sample size can really skew these report cards. Also, in DC, white, high SES students are the most likely students to opt-out of PARCC. If a couple of the best students aren't being tested, that will show up.

As for how to ask, I would ask the principal why he/she thinks some subgroups are performing better than others, particularly in X domain (not just overall but see what metric seems to be dragging them down). And ask how he/she plans to address it.[/quote]

Thanks this is helpful.  Our charter is small and white kids make up about a 1/3 of all kids. I did think about that factor and the impact of one or two kids with a small sample size.  [/quote]

No one should put this much importance into a f**king standardized test. It doesn’t tell you much about what your kids are learning. [/quote]

THIS. As a parent, this is what I really want to know.

Can we open the black box of the PARCC a bit more? Parents whose kids take it (mine is too young), what do you feel it's measuring and is it showing learning accurately in your view? Because all these many many dissections of metrics really boil down to these tests.[/quote]

Options

	Disable HTML in this message
	Disable BB Code in this message
	Disable smilies in this message

Review message

Search Recent Topics Hottest Topics