Toggle navigation
Toggle navigation
Home
DCUM Forums
Nanny Forums
Events
About DCUM
Advertising
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics
FAQs and Guidelines
Privacy Policy
Your current identity is: Anonymous
Login
Preview
Subject:
Forum Index
»
Montgomery County Public Schools (MCPS)
Reply to "MCPS BOE petition re: making student demographics the primary factor in redistricting decisions"
Subject:
Emoticons
More smilies
Text Color:
Default
Dark Red
Red
Orange
Brown
Yellow
Green
Olive
Cyan
Blue
Dark Blue
Violet
White
Black
Font:
Very Small
Small
Normal
Big
Giant
Close Marks
[quote=Anonymous][quote] don't know think Twinbrook by itself accounts for 15% of RM FARMS rate. TB accounts for close to 50% of all the ESs FARMs rate. So if you take TB out, RM FARMs rate would still be above 5%. It's hard to really gauge because RM FARMs rate doesn't equate to the total FARMs rate of all the ESs since the ESs have 6 grade and RM only has 4. If you add up all the FARMS of all the ES, it's about 30% of the population. But RM FARMs rate is about 20%; JW is about 23%. More than likely, CG (only 13% FARMs), which is part of RM would be rezoned to Crown. So, even with TB moving to Wootton, the FARMs rate at RM could actually stay about the same. RP and Beall combined have a FARMs rate of about 23%. Obviously some of this will be off since Bayard has openend, but it won't be that far off. But I agree about the homes in FG. I feel the same way.[/quote] So if CG and Twinbrook move out of RM who ends up going to RM? If RP and Beal both have 11.5% FARMS isn't RM now down to 11.5% - how does this make RM more balanced. Isn't the goal to get schools up to 30-40% FARMS? [/quote]
Options
Disable HTML in this message
Disable BB Code in this message
Disable smilies in this message
Review message
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics