Toggle navigation
Toggle navigation
Home
DCUM Forums
Nanny Forums
Events
About DCUM
Advertising
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics
FAQs and Guidelines
Privacy Policy
Your current identity is: Anonymous
Login
Preview
Subject:
Forum Index
»
Private & Independent Schools
Reply to "DC privates educating suburban kids"
Subject:
Emoticons
More smilies
Text Color:
Default
Dark Red
Red
Orange
Brown
Yellow
Green
Olive
Cyan
Blue
Dark Blue
Violet
White
Black
Font:
Very Small
Small
Normal
Big
Giant
Close Marks
[quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous]DC certainly is able to impose a commuter tax or something similar that would hit schools and other businesses; plenty of other cities do that, and I recall reading it has been proposed in DC many times. [/quote] Why, no, we can't. Our Congressional masters have explicitly forbidden it .... [/quote] Do you know that for fact -- i.e., that the Congressional Oversight committees explicitly forbid a commuter tax or anything similar? Or are you just saying we in DC would have to make sure it is not blocked by Congress? I don't know whether it's ever been proposed before, or what the outcome was. Can you educate me?[/quote] Yes, it's a fact. The Home Rule Act of 1973 forbids the DC Council from taxing any portion of a non-resident's personal income. http://www.abfa.com/ogc/tit6.htm (see Section 602(5)). That ban has been litigated in, and upheld by, lower federal courts, most recently in 2005. That case was appealed to the Supreme Court, which refused to hear it. (Justice Roberts was one of the appeals court judges who upheld the ban below). DC Council will, no doubt, continue to fight the ban -- there's been talk about an amendment to the Charter (which, itself, would require Congressional approval and, if successful, would merely remove the categorical prohibition. Tax legislation, like any other DC legislation, would still be subject to Congressional override). The most recent proposal I heard in the Council (last Spring) was to tax the income of DC government employees who lived outside the jurisdiction. Don't know whether that went anywhere. Without a Charter Amendment, I can't see the federal courts upholding it. [/quote]
Options
Disable HTML in this message
Disable BB Code in this message
Disable smilies in this message
Review message
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics