Reply to Breaking: Debbie Wasserman-Schulz' IT staffer arrested while trying to flee US

Forum Index » Political Discussion

Reply to "Breaking: Debbie Wasserman-Schulz' IT staffer arrested while trying to flee US "

Subject:

Emoticons





More smilies

Text Color: Font: Close Marks

[quote=Anonymous][quote=jsteele][quote=Anonymous][quote=jsteele][quote=Anonymous]No Jeff, Luke Rosiak has been reporting on this story for over 6 months.

In this one, DWS admits she has violated the IT security policies “for years and years and years.” - date of report May 31, 2017

http://dailycaller.com/2017/05/31/wasserman-schultz-admits-hill-it-security-violations-blames-house-administrators-for-not-stopping-her-video/

In this one, Awan had access to all the DNC emails - date of report March 9, 2017

http://dailycaller.com/2017/03/09/suspect-in-house-it-security-probe-also-had-access-to-dnc-emails/

Or perhaps this oldie but goodie...  DWS is "negotiating’ with police over access to "evidence" in hacking probe - July 19, 2017

http://dailycaller.com/2017/07/19/wasserman-schultz-may-start-cooperating-with-house-hacking-probe/

There is a smoking gun here people, regardless of what Jeff and the left minions are trying to squash.  Its all here for people to read:

http://s3-us-west-2.amazonaws.com/dailycaller/awanseries.html

[/quote]

This is a more credible source, I'll grant you. But, my response was in reply to your linking to a Gateway Pundit article and saying, "Waiting for Jeff and the minions to link the source of the article with the pizzagate conspiracy." I did just as you expected. Now that you have switched to another source, are you admitting your error with Gateway Pundit?

I will note that even according to the Daily Caller, Awan has been under investigation for nearly six months and the result was a charge for lying on his mortgage application. Whatever smoke there is must not lead to much of a fire if they couldn't do better than that.
[/quote]

DP. Some investigations last for a lot longer than six months! The authorities pretty obviously weren't planning on charging him this week. The current charge was made to get him off the plane and keep him in the country. [/quote]

We agree. After six months, this was the best they could do. Even after six months there was no computer-related charge they could hang on him.
[/quote]

They're not going to charge him with the additional counts until they are ready. This is standard practice. It only takes the single charge to keep him in the country. [/quote]

Options

	Disable HTML in this message
	Disable BB Code in this message
	Disable smilies in this message

Review message

Search Recent Topics Hottest Topics