Reply to Feedback on VLC Club Lacrosse?

Forum Index » Lacrosse

Reply to "Feedback on VLC Club Lacrosse?"

Subject:

Emoticons





More smilies

Text Color: Font: Close Marks

[quote=Anonymous]Not sure how this turned into a bash True discussion.

VLC has/had great brand recognition and as a previous poster stated could get into some high level tournaments that other clubs couldn't due to their affiliation with Crabs.

A good group of parents and players tried really hard to make the younger age groups work.  They weren't making unreasonable demands of the club.  They just wanted clarity and communication.

Admittedly, there were a small group of parents with unrealistic expectations.  Unfortunately, they created a negative atmosphere the other parents tried to correct.  Ultimately, the toxic group left mid-season.  Unfortunately that left teams short handed, and the club did little to help with the situation.  Despite that, the remaining parents worked hard to keep the teams competitive.  But, when it came to tryout season, what were they going to do?  Stay with a perceived sinking ship?

You state True is sub-par against VLC.  But if VLC doesn't offer a competitive product, where should the players go?  As you stated, MadLax is a disaster in its own way.  Top Caliber is a good program, but with an extreme focus on Robinson/Madison.  So what other options are there?  Hammers?  St James?  While there are often comments that the youth club lacrosse market is oversaturated with teams, there really aren't a lot of options in Northern Virginia unless you want to spend your evenings driving in rush hour traffic to MD to try for Next Level or DC Express / Bethesda.

So to the poster stating that True is not the solution (at least for this year with the impacted age groups)...what is?[/quote]

Options

	Disable HTML in this message
	Disable BB Code in this message
	Disable smilies in this message

Review message

Search Recent Topics Hottest Topics