Toggle navigation
Toggle navigation
Home
DCUM Forums
Nanny Forums
Events
About DCUM
Advertising
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics
FAQs and Guidelines
Privacy Policy
Your current identity is: Anonymous
Login
Preview
Subject:
Forum Index
»
Metropolitan DC Local Politics
Reply to "Hearst Playground story in Current"
Subject:
Emoticons
More smilies
Text Color:
Default
Dark Red
Red
Orange
Brown
Yellow
Green
Olive
Cyan
Blue
Dark Blue
Violet
White
Black
Font:
Very Small
Small
Normal
Big
Giant
Close Marks
[quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous]I live across the street from Hearst and am delighted that it will not have a pool. A pool would destroy the neighborhood during the summer months with all the cars and the noise. It would also take away some of the lovely tennis courts, which unlike a pool can be used year around and w/o all of the commotion of a pool. And we much prefer looking out on the open green space than a pool facility thank you very much. [/quote] I wouldn't hold my breath waiting for construction of a pool at Hearst Park. The mayor has made it clear that the pool at that site is not a priority for her. Cheh has told people that she was surprised at the extent of opposition to a pool. Even if a pool were to get through the DC process, it would likely be stopped on environmental grounds given the water issues at Hearst and the fact that much of the park is built on loose fill. And, because of that, even if a lawsuit and other challenges on environmental grounds were unsuccessful, the hydrology and soil stabilization challenges would likely cause the pool's cost to increase 2x-3x, dooming it in the end. This is basically what happened with reopening Klingle Road. It wasn't opposition alone that killed it -- it was that, combined with the astronomical cost of addressing water and soil issues in order to construct a new roadbed there.[/quote]
Options
Disable HTML in this message
Disable BB Code in this message
Disable smilies in this message
Review message
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics