Toggle navigation
Toggle navigation
Home
DCUM Forums
Nanny Forums
Events
About DCUM
Advertising
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics
FAQs and Guidelines
Privacy Policy
Your current identity is: Anonymous
Login
Preview
Subject:
Forum Index
»
Political Discussion
Reply to "Barr Installs Outside Prosecutor to Review Case Against Michael Flynn, Ex-Trump Adviser"
Subject:
Emoticons
More smilies
Text Color:
Default
Dark Red
Red
Orange
Brown
Yellow
Green
Olive
Cyan
Blue
Dark Blue
Violet
White
Black
Font:
Very Small
Small
Normal
Big
Giant
Close Marks
[quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous]This is pretty damning..... [quote]Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI) agents tasked by fired former Director James Comey to take down Donald Trump during and after the 2016 election were so concerned about the agency’s potentially illegal behavior that they purchased liability insurance to protect themselves less than two weeks before Trump was inaugurated president, previously hidden FBI text messages show. The explosive new communications and internal FBI notes were disclosed in federal court filings today from Sidney Powell, the attorney who heads Michael Flynn’s legal defense team. “[W]e all went and purchased professional liability insurance,” one agent texted on Jan. 10, 2017, the same day CNN leaked details that then-President-elect Trump had been briefed by Comey about the bogus Christopher Steele dossier. That briefing of Trump was used as a pretext to legitimize the debunked dossier, which was funded by the Democratic National Committee and the Clinton campaign and compiled by a foreign intelligence officer who was working for a sanctioned Russian oligarch. “Holy crap,” an agent responded. “All the analysts too?” “Yep,” the first agent said. “All the folks at the Agency as well.” “[C]an I ask who are the most likely litigators?” an agent responded. “[A]s far as potentially suing y’all[?]” “[H]aha, who knows….I think [t]he concern when we got it was that there was a big leak at DOJ and the NYT among others was going to do a piece,” the first agent said. While the names of the agents responsible for the texts are redacted, the legal filing from Powell, quoting communications from the Department of Justice (DOJ[/quote] https://thefederalist.com/2020/09/24/trump-was-right-explosive-new-fbi-texts-detail-internal-furor-over-handling-of-crossfire-hurricane-investigation/[/quote] The Federalist? :roll: [b]Also, it's very common for IC people to have PLI. It's not out of the ordinary in the least[/b].[/quote] This is BS. [/quote] DP. Can’t speak to the IC particularly, but it’s not uncommon at all for attorneys employed by the federal government to carry liability insurance. Same for managerial-level. It’s more common in some agencies than others, though, depending on how often legal action is taken against people from those agencies.[/quote] My spouse worked for the FBI and has never heard of it, nor was ever offered it. [/quote] I've heard of it. The government doesn't offer it, you have to get it on your own.[/quote] +1. It’s not an employment benefit, it’s something you get on you’re own protect yourself if there’s legal action against you and the government decides not to defend you, such as because they say you went outside the scope of your employment.[/quote] Sounds like these agents knew they were going to be in deep doo doo if their work was ever discovered. [/quote] Not necessarily. They may have been concerned that they would become the targets of a baseless and politically-motivated attacks by Trump in retaliation for their legitimate work. Any professional liability policy purchased for the first time in January 2017 would not cover known misconduct that occurred in 2016. That’s simply not how insurance works.[/quote] Hmmm..... these are THEIR texts.... “[T]he new AG might have some questions….then yada yada yada…we all get screwed,” one agent wrote. “I’m tellying [sic] man, if this thing ever gets FOIA’d, there are going to be some tough questions asked,” one agent wrote. “[A]nd a great deal of those will be related to Brian having a scope way outside the boundaries of logic[.]” “[REDACTED] is one of the worst offenders of the rabbit holes and conspiracy theories,” an agent texted. They KNEW this whole "investigation" was a bunch of BS. [/quote] If you don’t assume you know what the texts are referencing, they don’t mean much if anything on their own. You’re reading in what you want to see. But it’s okay, we’ll just wait for the indictments. Brennan’s is coming any day now, right?[/quote]
Options
Disable HTML in this message
Disable BB Code in this message
Disable smilies in this message
Review message
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics
