Toggle navigation
Toggle navigation
Home
DCUM Forums
Nanny Forums
Events
About DCUM
Advertising
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics
FAQs and Guidelines
Privacy Policy
Your current identity is: Anonymous
Login
Preview
Subject:
Forum Index
»
Private & Independent Schools
Reply to "Big GDS news"
Subject:
Emoticons
More smilies
Text Color:
Default
Dark Red
Red
Orange
Brown
Yellow
Green
Olive
Cyan
Blue
Dark Blue
Violet
White
Black
Font:
Very Small
Small
Normal
Big
Giant
Close Marks
[quote=Anonymous]I have no idea where your numbers are coming from. I can't figure out how you're getting there. I mean, even your numbers for commercial/multifamily are flipped, commercial is always lower density than residential. You keep telling yourself it's not medium density. The map amendment and the density are acceptable under PUD rules. And if it isn't, then neither is Tenley Hill, with its 4.5 land/development ratio. You keep acting like the only part of the comprehensive plan is just the zoning map, when it states very explicitly that there's more to it than that. It's within the letter and the spirit of the comprehensive plan. And it's still denser than what could be built matter of right. Plus benefits. [/quote]
Options
Disable HTML in this message
Disable BB Code in this message
Disable smilies in this message
Review message
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics
