Toggle navigation
Toggle navigation
Home
DCUM Forums
Nanny Forums
Events
About DCUM
Advertising
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics
FAQs and Guidelines
Privacy Policy
Your current identity is: Anonymous
Login
Preview
Subject:
Forum Index
»
Metropolitan DC Local Politics
Reply to "Hearst Playground story in Current"
Subject:
Emoticons
More smilies
Text Color:
Default
Dark Red
Red
Orange
Brown
Yellow
Green
Olive
Cyan
Blue
Dark Blue
Violet
White
Black
Font:
Very Small
Small
Normal
Big
Giant
Close Marks
[quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous]"I said the argument, not the arguer, was stupid. Which it is. So if you want to continuing arguing to the broader community that badly wants a swimming pool in their own part of town that a reason they shouldn't get one is because the immediate neighbors are worried about looking at a shuttered facility part of the year go right ahead and continue looking vain and stupid and I'll add selfish." I favor preserving the park for future generations, how is that selfish? And by the way, your post contradicts itself, which is stupid. [/quote] Love love love the faux environmental arguments from the immediate neighbors. DPR=Department of Parks and Recreation There should be some recreation at our public parks. How again does adding a pool take aware the park from future generations? Currently [b]no one in a future generation uses the park in summer because of the under used tennis courts that are there for the current aging generation.[/b] Your arguments are vain, selfish and stupid. If you want to make the inference that you are vain selfish and stupid that is on you.[/quote] I guess your rude and course message is a sign of today's mean times. You sound like the person who actually has been sending pointed emails to various longtime residents of the neighborhood, telling them to move on and make way for younger people. Incredible but true.[/quote] Nope I haven't been emailing people such a message though given the incredibly inaccurate characterizations of facts coming from the immediate neighbors I'm willing to be bet this characterization is inaccurate too. But is the underlying message untrue? Is it not the case that a lightly used rec amenity popular with older residents (the tennis courts) are staying instead of a much more popular rec amenity (a pool) for younger residents. At this point it really feels like the message from the immediate neighbors is that this is their park and how dare anyone come along and question how it is used or their wacky and speculative arguments against changing the park.[/quote]
Options
Disable HTML in this message
Disable BB Code in this message
Disable smilies in this message
Review message
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics