Reply to Indictment Monday?

Forum Index » Political Discussion

Reply to "Indictment Monday?"

Subject:

Emoticons





More smilies

Text Color: Font: Close Marks

[quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous]When will the head of the FEC testify that this case didn't warrant even a fine? Oh yeah... Judge didn't allow this witness to testify - rigged![/quote]

Yeah,  Each day brings mounting appeal issues.  Judge doesn't care.  His goal is to get a conviction prior to the election. An appeal overturning this circus would happen AFTER the election.  
As I heard someone say - the bucket is now overflowing with grounds for appeal.

[twitter]https://twitter.com/ByronYork/status/1787600814044787063[/twitter][/quote]

Ah yes, he will definitely win an appeal by arguing that the judge should have allowed a witness to testify even though he has no personal knowledge of any of the facts in the case.[/quote]

Good grief. 
Somehow..... he has allowed the prosecution to do exactly what you said.  
In the case of Smith - he knows FEC regulations and laws.  He is far more relevant a witness than David Pecker.  
And, my gosh... if you have been following this case and the bias by this judge... there are grounds for appeal nearly every day.  [/quote]

This is a new york case, not a federal case. There is no FEC jurisdiction here. [/quote]
Then why are they trying to endorce federal election law?[/quote]

Options

	Disable HTML in this message
	Disable BB Code in this message
	Disable smilies in this message

Review message

Search Recent Topics Hottest Topics