Reply to Hearst Playground story in Current

Forum Index » Metropolitan DC Local Politics

Reply to "Hearst Playground story in Current"

Subject:

Emoticons





More smilies

Text Color: Font: Close Marks

[quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous]"I said the argument, not the arguer, was stupid.

Which it is.

So if you want to continuing arguing to the broader community that badly wants a swimming pool in their own part of town that a reason they shouldn't get one is because the immediate neighbors are worried about looking at a shuttered facility part of the year go right ahead and continue looking vain and stupid and I'll add selfish."

I favor preserving the park for future generations, how is that selfish?

And by the way, your post contradicts itself, which is stupid. [/quote]

Love love love the faux environmental arguments from the immediate neighbors.

DPR=Department of Parks and Recreation

There should be some recreation at our public parks.

How again does adding a pool take aware the park from future generations?

Currently no one in a future generation uses the park in summer because of the under used tennis courts that are there for the current aging generation.

Your arguments are vain, selfish and stupid.  If you want to make the inference that you are vain selfish and stupid that is on you.[/quote]

Options

	Disable HTML in this message
	Disable BB Code in this message
	Disable smilies in this message

Review message

Search Recent Topics Hottest Topics