Toggle navigation
Toggle navigation
Home
DCUM Forums
Nanny Forums
Events
About DCUM
Advertising
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics
FAQs and Guidelines
Privacy Policy
Your current identity is: Anonymous
Login
Preview
Subject:
Forum Index
»
Metropolitan DC Local Politics
Reply to "Hearst Playground story in Current"
Subject:
Emoticons
More smilies
Text Color:
Default
Dark Red
Red
Orange
Brown
Yellow
Green
Olive
Cyan
Blue
Dark Blue
Violet
White
Black
Font:
Very Small
Small
Normal
Big
Giant
Close Marks
[quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous]I am not anti pool at all and am not a nearby neighbor to Hearst Park. However, my kids use Hearst a lot, and it's just too small of a location for a pool withiut fundamentally altering the park, the whole reason that Hearst was chosen in the first place was it was politically and bureaucratically expedient. Cheh thought that it would be nice if Ward 3 had its "own" pool, Hearst was next in line for a renovation, so it was convenient simply to attach some additional funding to the Hearst appropriation for a pool. No site analysis was done and no alternatives were considered. There was never any real outreach to the Park Service for a possible site at centrally-located Ft Reno. DPR staff made clear initially that a pool at Hearst was not their choice. While the Department of General Services then moved forward for pool planning at Hearst, the mayor took the pool funds out of the next budget and Cheh herself has made no effort to restore them. My sense is that ultimately, while there may be a pool, it will not be built at Hearst.[/quote] If you are not anti-pool and not a nearby neighbor then why are you repeating, verbatim, the many times over dis-proven talking points of the anti-pool neighbors? No site analysis was done - not true no alternatives were considered - not true There was never any real outreach to the Park Service - not true DPR staff made clear initially that a pool at Hearst was not their choice - never even heard this one before - since I've attended all of the meetings and even the anti-pool folks haven't referenced revealing this via FOIA for the moment I'm going to assume that this is also not true Cheh herself has made no effort to restore them - not true Therefore I am assuming that "I am not anti pool at all and am not a nearby neighbor to Hearst Park" - also not true BTW if you are not a neighbor why would you be using Hearst a lot? It offers nothing that other parks in the immediate area don't also offer.[/quote]
Options
Disable HTML in this message
Disable BB Code in this message
Disable smilies in this message
Review message
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics