Reply to ECNL forcing Brave & Union Partnership

Forum Index » Soccer

Reply to "ECNL forcing Brave & Union Partnership"

Subject:

Emoticons





More smilies

Text Color: Font: Close Marks

[quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous]How happy would we be if ECNL took away both Brave and Union's boys programs?  That was the threat. Then we'd complain that the clubs didn't do anything to protect their teams.  No win situation.[/quote]

LW should get the "Captain of The Titanic Award" instead of the USYS Honor Award for her handling of this merger. It keeps being stated the clubs had no choice and that the club is doing this in the best interest of its members. Let's be real. The league wasn't kicking out Union Girls ECNL. The only question is if the club would be better off without Union Boys ECNL. Brave was/is a lost cause no mater what. Let them die and preserve what we have. Sometimes the best thing is to do nothing. Instead they panicked. Given the current outcome of Boys coaches leaving I'm 100% sure the parents would rather have kept their coaches over the league status. The problem is that MYS leadership didn't even bother to ask their members what THEY wanted. That is why they are upset with this merger. There was path forward for McLean to retain it's Girls ECNL program without causing such turmoil in the Boys program. LW and CW have destroyed the legacy that was McLean. Nobody is going to recognize this club in the coming years.[/quote]

Probably corret.  LW and CW pushed to combine the girls (voluntarily) in addition to the boys (that ECNL forced)[/quote]

Well said...and I'm a parent of an MYS/VA Union boy.  [/quote]

Options

	Disable HTML in this message
	Disable BB Code in this message
	Disable smilies in this message

Review message

Search Recent Topics Hottest Topics